These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2059413)

  • 1. Further evidence for cognitive inertia of persons with mental retardation.
    Ellis NR; Dulaney CL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1991 May; 95(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 2059413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic-effortful processing and cognitive inertia in persons with mental retardation.
    Ellis NR; Woodley-Zanthos P; Dulaney CL; Palmer RL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1989 Jan; 93(4):412-23. PubMed ID: 2930658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatized responding and cognitive inertia in individuals with mental retardation.
    Dulaney CL; Ellis NR
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Jul; 99(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 7946256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention and attentional shift efficiency in individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Bergen AM; Mosley JL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 May; 98(6):732-43. PubMed ID: 8054202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relation between receptive language and cognitive maturity in persons with mental retardation.
    Abbeduto L; Nuccio JB
    Am J Ment Retard; 1991 Sep; 96(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 1930947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mental retardation and the acquisition of automatic processing.
    Merrill EC; Goodwyn EH; Gooding HL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1996 Jul; 101(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 8827251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facilitation and inhibition effects in visual selective attention processes of individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Cha KH; Merrill EC
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):594-600. PubMed ID: 8192905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of typicality level on proactive inhibition in adults with mental retardation.
    Winters JJ; Hoats DL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 May; 92(6):517-24. PubMed ID: 3370151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Selective attention in major depression: clinical retardation and cognitive inhibition].
    Benoît G; Fortin L; Lemelin S; Laplante L; Thomas J; Everett J
    Can J Psychol; 1992 Mar; 46(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 1591649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blank-comparison assessment of stimulus-stimulus relations in individuals with mental retardation: a methodological note.
    Serna RW; Wilkinson KM; McIlvane WJ
    Am J Ment Retard; 1998 Jul; 103(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 9678231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interference and negative priming effects in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E; Rucklidge JJ
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(1):91-122. PubMed ID: 17450641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interference and inhibition in tasks of selective attention by persons with and without mental retardation.
    Merrill EC
    Am J Ment Retard; 2006 May; 111(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 16597188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidencing inhibitory deficits in Alzheimer's disease through interference effects and shifting disabilities in the Stroop test.
    Amieva H; Lafont S; Rouch-Leroyer I; Rainville C; Dartigues JF; Orgogozo JM; Fabrigoule C
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 19(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 15288332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E
    Dev Psychol; 2004 Mar; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 14979760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allocation of attention and effect of practice on persons with and without mental retardation.
    Oka K; Miura T
    Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 17383855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance in auditory and visual emotional stroop tasks: a comparison of older and younger adults.
    Wurm LH; Labouvie-Vief G; Aycock J; Rebucal KA; Koch HE
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 15383002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical inefficiency in patients with unipolar depression: an event-related FMRI study with the Stroop task.
    Wagner G; Sinsel E; Sobanski T; Köhler S; Marinou V; Mentzel HJ; Sauer H; Schlösser RG
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 May; 59(10):958-65. PubMed ID: 16458263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.