These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20595928)

  • 1. Computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function.
    Hart DL; Werneke MW; Wang YC; Stratford PW; Mioduski JE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Nov; 35(24):2157-64. PubMed ID: 20595928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical interpretation of outcome measures generated from a lumbar computerized adaptive test.
    Wang YC; Hart DL; Werneke M; Stratford PW; Mioduski JE
    Phys Ther; 2010 Sep; 90(9):1323-35. PubMed ID: 20616116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function.
    Hart DL; Mioduski JE; Werneke MW; Stratford PW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 59(9):947-56. PubMed ID: 16895818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments produced responsive measures of function.
    Hart DL; Wang YC; Cook KF; Mioduski JE
    Phys Ther; 2010 Jun; 90(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 20395304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computerized adaptive test for patients with hip impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function.
    Hart DL; Wang YC; Stratford PW; Mioduski JE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 89(11):2129-39. PubMed ID: 18996242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quantified lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon is a useful measurement of improvement in a functional restoration program.
    Mayer TG; Neblett R; Brede E; Gatchel RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2458-65. PubMed ID: 19789467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computerized adaptive test for patients with knee impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function.
    Hart DL; Wang YC; Stratford PW; Mioduski JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1113-24. PubMed ID: 18619788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical interpretation of a lower-extremity functional scale-derived computerized adaptive test.
    Wang YC; Hart DL; Stratford PW; Mioduski JE
    Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):957-68. PubMed ID: 19628577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship of physical examination findings and self-reported symptom severity and physical function in patients with degenerative lumbar conditions.
    Lyle MA; Manes S; McGuinness M; Ziaei S; Iversen MD
    Phys Ther; 2005 Feb; 85(2):120-33. PubMed ID: 15679463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical spine outcomes questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.
    BenDebba M; Heller J; Ducker TB; Eisinger JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(19):2116-23; discussion 2124. PubMed ID: 12394923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?
    Bridwell KH; Berven S; Glassman S; Hamill C; Horton WC; Lenke LG; Schwab F; Baldus C; Shainline M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(20):2220-5. PubMed ID: 17873814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: validation of the CAT-5D-QOL.
    Kopec JA; Badii M; McKenna M; Lima VD; Sayre EC; Dvorak M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1384-90. PubMed ID: 18496353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease--validation against condition-specific measures.
    Guilfoyle MR; Seeley H; Laing RJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2009 Aug; 23(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 19637011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Tomkins-Lane CC; Battié MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Nov; 35(23):2097-102. PubMed ID: 20938380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery.
    Slover J; Abdu WA; Hanscom B; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1974-80. PubMed ID: 16924216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study.
    Nathan M; Keller TS
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Sep; 17(7):431-41. PubMed ID: 7989876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) also valid and responsive in patients with neck complaints.
    Huisstede BM; Feleus A; Bierma-Zeinstra SM; Verhaar JA; Koes BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):E130-8. PubMed ID: 19182703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical spine disorders.
    Hermann KM; Reese CS
    Phys Ther; 2001 Mar; 81(3):903-14. PubMed ID: 11268155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.