These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20596695)

  • 1. Staff attitudes and thoughts about the use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards.
    Husum TL; Bjørngaard JH; Finset A; Ruud T
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):893-901. PubMed ID: 20596695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in opinions on coercion use among mental healthcare professionals: a questionnaire study.
    Birkeland S; Bogh SB; Pedersen ML; Kerring JH; Morsø L; Tingleff EB; Gildberg FA
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2024 Jul; 78(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 38626028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between leadership, teamworking, structure, burnout and attitude to patients on acute psychiatric wards.
    Bowers L; Nijman H; Simpson A; Jones J
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 46(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 20082064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The significance of ethics reflection groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals.
    Hem MH; Molewijk B; Gjerberg E; Lillemoen L; Pedersen R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 29871682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual factors influencing the use of coercive measures in Portuguese mental health care.
    Aluh DO; Santos-Dias M; Silva M; Pedrosa B; Grigaitė U; Silva RC; de Almeida Mousinho MF; Antunes JP; Remelhe M; Cardoso G; Caldas-de-Almeida JM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2023; 90():101918. PubMed ID: 37541138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of coercion in mental healthcare services in Nigeria: Service providers' perspective.
    Aluh DO; Ayilara O; Onu JU; Pedrosa B; Silva M; Grigaitė U; Santos-Dias M; Cardoso G; Caldas-de-Almeida JM
    J Ment Health; 2024 Feb; 33(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 36850036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abolition of coercion in mental health services - A European survey of feasibility.
    Birkeland S; Steinert T; Whittington R; Gildberg FA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 94():101992. PubMed ID: 38763063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. De-implementation to reduce coercive practices in mental health care.
    Sergerie-Richard S; Goulet MH; Dumais A; Hinse C; Fontaine G
    Lancet Psychiatry; 2024 Jul; 11(7):498-499. PubMed ID: 38879271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the Associations between Patient-Reported Quality of Care and Perceived Coercion: A Norwegian Cross-Sectional Study.
    Fossum SØ; Moen ØL; Gonzalez MT; Schröder A; Skundberg-Kletthagen H
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2024 Jul; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38976249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving seclusion practice: implications of a review of staff and patient views.
    Van Der Merwe M; Muir-Cochrane E; Jones J; Tziggili M; Bowers L
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2013 Apr; 20(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 22805615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience of violence and attitudes of staff members towards coercion in psychiatric settings: observational study.
    Wullschleger A; Chatton A; Kuenzi N; Baeriswyl R; Kaiser S; Bartolomei J
    BJPsych Open; 2024 Apr; 10(3):e80. PubMed ID: 38616714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Zero Tolerance for Coercion? Historical, Cultural and Organisational Contexts for Effective Implementation of Coercion-Free Mental Health Services around the World.
    Whittington R; Aluh DO; Caldas-de-Almeida JM
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Oct; 11(21):. PubMed ID: 37957978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the staff attitude to coercion scale: an exploratory factor analysis.
    Venturini P; Bassi G; Salcuni S; Kotzalidis GD; Telesforo CL; Salustri E; Trevisi M; Roselli V; Tarsitani L; Infante V; Niolu C; Polselli G; Boldrini T
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1172803. PubMed ID: 37293405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic literature review of the use of Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS).
    Husum TL; Siqveland J; Ruud T; Lickiewicz J
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1063276. PubMed ID: 36824675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geographical variation in compulsory hospitalisation - ethical challenges.
    Hofstad T; Husum TL; Rugkåsa J; Hofmann BM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1507. PubMed ID: 36496384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of the Japanese version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.
    Fukasawa M; Miyake M; Kikkawa T; Sueyasu T
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1026676. PubMed ID: 36325534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-center pilot study on the effects of clinical ethics support on coercive measures in psychiatry.
    Stoll J; Westermair AL; Kübler U; Reisch T; Cattapan K; Bridler R; Maier R; Trachsel M
    BMC Psychiatry; 2022 Jun; 22(1):370. PubMed ID: 35650555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement Properties of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale: A Systematic Review.
    Husum TL; Ruud T; Lickiewicz J; Siqveland J
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():744661. PubMed ID: 35573326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of coercive measures in different psychiatric hospitals: the impact of institutional characteristics.
    Mann K; Gröschel S; Singer S; Breitmaier J; Claus S; Fani M; Rambach S; Salize HJ; Lieb K
    BMC Psychiatry; 2021 Aug; 21(1):419. PubMed ID: 34419009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.