These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20597608)

  • 21. The Epidemiological Challenges of Breast Cancer among Premenopausal Women in Limited Resource Settings.
    Torres-Mejía G; Navarro-Lechuga E; Tuesca-Molina RJ; Ángeles-Llerenas A
    Rev Invest Clin; 2017; 69(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 28453504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Breast screening].
    Korzhenkova GP
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2013; (1):46-9. PubMed ID: 23700927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bringing an end to mandatory breast cancer screening in Uruguay.
    Thornton H
    BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g390. PubMed ID: 24449468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of population-based mammography screening starting between age 40 and 50 in the presence of adjuvant systemic therapy.
    de Gelder R; Heijnsdijk EA; Fracheboud J; Draisma G; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Jul; 137(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 25430053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast imaging and intervention in the overweight and obese patient.
    Destounis S; Newell M; Pinsky R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 21257879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital mammography screening: weighing reduced mortality against increased overdiagnosis.
    de Gelder R; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten G; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ; Draisma G; de Koning HJ
    Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):134-40. PubMed ID: 21718717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Complexity of Achieving the Promise of Precision Breast Cancer Screening.
    Haas JS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Jan; 109(5):. PubMed ID: 28130476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bad medicine: clinical breast examination.
    Spence D
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6789. PubMed ID: 23060657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
    Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
    Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adherence to a breast cancer screening program and its predictors in underserved women in southern Brazil.
    Caleffi M; Ribeiro RA; Bedin AJ; Viegas-Butzke JM; Baldisserotto FD; Skonieski GP; Giacomazzi J; Camey SA; Ashton-Prolla P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Oct; 19(10):2673-9. PubMed ID: 20716620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for breast and cervical cancer: understanding the different recommendations.
    Somerall DW
    Nurs Womens Health; 2013; 17(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 23957799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Panel Recommends Mammograms Start at 50.
    Colwell J
    Cancer Discov; 2016 Mar; 6(3):220. PubMed ID: 26792764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast density legislation fueling controversy.
    Brower V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Apr; 105(8):510-1. PubMed ID: 23524285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pathways to breast cancer screening artificial intelligence algorithm validation.
    Lee CI; Houssami N; Elmore JG; Buist DSM
    Breast; 2020 Aug; 52():146-149. PubMed ID: 31540699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast Cancer With a Poor Prognosis Diagnosed After Screening Mammography With Negative Results.
    McCarthy AM; Barlow WE; Conant EF; Haas JS; Li CI; Sprague BL; Armstrong K;
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jul; 4(7):998-1001. PubMed ID: 29801067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening: Trade-offs between Sensitivity and Specificity.
    Bahl M; Do S
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e240184. PubMed ID: 38717286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammography screening and women with symptomatic breast cancer.
    Autier P
    Nat Rev Clin Oncol; 2013 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 23881036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Artificial Intelligence Improves Breast Cancer Screening in Study.
    Abbasi J
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(6):499. PubMed ID: 32044919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.