These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20597725)

  • 1. Factorial validity of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS).
    Kuppens S; Bossaert G; Buntinx W; Molleman C; Van den Abbeele A; Maes B
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2010 Jul; 115(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 20597725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS).
    Verdugo MA; Arias B; Ibanez A; Schalock RL
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2010 Nov; 115(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 20946002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) for persons with other than intellectual disabilities.
    Bossaert G; Kuppens S; Buntinx W; Molleman C; Van den Abeele A; Maes B
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(6):1306-16. PubMed ID: 19539445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Support for the construct validity of the Supports Intensity Scale based on clinician rankings of need.
    Weiss JA; Lunsky Y; Tassé MJ; Durbin J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):933-41. PubMed ID: 19264446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (French version).
    Morin D; Cobigo V
    Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Feb; 47(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19170416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement invariance in the assessment of people with an intellectual disability.
    MacLean H; McKenzie K; Kidd G; Murray AL; Schwannauer M
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(3):1081-5. PubMed ID: 21296555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factorial validity of the Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes towards Children with Handicaps Scale (CATCH).
    Bossaert G; Petry K
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Apr; 34(4):1336-45. PubMed ID: 23417138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The intellectual disability version of the very short form of the physical self-inventory (PSI-VS-ID): cross-validation and measurement invariance across gender, weight, age and intellectual disability level.
    Maïano C; Morin AJ; Bégarie J; Ninot G
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(5):1652-62. PubMed ID: 21435835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct and criterion validities of the Service Need Assessment Profile (SNAP): a measure of support for people with disabilities.
    Guscia R; Harries J; Kirby N; Nettelbeck T; Taplin J
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2006 Sep; 31(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 16954092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the Protection and Advocacy Subscale on the Factorial Validity of the Supports Intensity Scale-Adult Version.
    Shogren KA; Seo H; Wehmeyer ML; Thompson JR; Little TD
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2016 Jan; 121(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 26701074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Supports Intensity Scale in French.
    Lamoureux-Hébert M; Morin D
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Jan; 114(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 19143464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) to predict extraordinary support needs.
    Wehmeyer M; Chapman TE; Little TD; Thompson JR; Schalock R; Tassé MJ
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Jan; 114(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19143461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Validity of the Supports Intensity Scale for Adults With Motor Disability.
    Arnkelsson G; Sigurdsson T
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2016 Mar; 121(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 26914468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability.
    Thompson JR; Bradley VJ; Buntinx WH; Schalock RL; Shogren KA; Snell ME; Wehmeyer ML; Borthwick-Duffy S; Coulter DL; Craig EP; Gomez SC; Lachapelle Y; Luckasson RA; Reeve A; Spreat S; Tassé MJ; Verdugo MA; Yeager MH
    Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Apr; 47(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 19368481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The validity of the Supports Intensity Scale for adults with psychiatric disabilities.
    Arnkelsson G; Sigurdsson T
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Dec; 35(12):3665-71. PubMed ID: 25262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Older and younger family caregivers of adults with intellectual disability: factors associated with future plans.
    Chou YC; Lee YC; Lin LC; Kröger T; Chang AN
    Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Aug; 47(4):282-94. PubMed ID: 19650682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Construct Validation of the Supports Intensity Scale - Children and Adult Versions: An Application of a Pseudo Multitrait-Multimethod Approach.
    Seo H; Shogren KA; Little TD; Thompson JR; Wehmeyer ML
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2016 Nov; 121(6):550-563. PubMed ID: 27802098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilization of the supports intensity scale with psychiatric populations: psychometric properties and utility for service delivery planning.
    Jenaro C; Cruz M; Perez Mdel C; Flores NE; Vega V
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2011 Oct; 25(5):e9-17. PubMed ID: 21978811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity, invariance and responsiveness of a self-report measure of functional limitations and disability in multiple sclerosis.
    Motl RW; McAuley E; Suh Y
    Disabil Rehabil; 2010; 32(15):1260-71. PubMed ID: 20131947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the inter-respondent (consumer vs. staff) reliability and construct validity (SIS vs. Vineland) of the Supports Intensity Scale on a Dutch sample.
    Claes C; Van Hove G; van Loon J; Vandevelde S; Schalock RL
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Apr; 53(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 19207283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.