340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20598052)
1. Comparison of clinical effects between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy on large uteruses over 300 grams.
Kim HB; Song JE; Kim GH; Cho HY; Lee KY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Jun; 36(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 20598052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.
Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical comparison of transvaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Bai WP; Li LP; Feng MY; Wang XH; Qin XQ; Li KM; Zhou YF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 40(10):656-8. PubMed ID: 16277892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Dayaratna S; Goldberg J; Harrington C; Leiby BE; McNeil JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 210(2):120.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24060444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in cases of very large uteri: a retrospective comparative study.
Fiaccavento A; Landi S; Barbieri F; Zaccoletti R; Tricolore C; Ceccaroni M; Pomini P; Bruni F; Soriano D; Stepniewska A; Selvaggi L; Zanolla L; Minelli L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 17848315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus coagulation of uterine arteries (CUA) at their origin plus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for the management of myoma and adenomyosis.
Pan HS; Ko ML; Huang LW; Chang JZ; Hwang JL; Chen SC
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 18850461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Bogani G; Casarin J; Formenti G; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 23870240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical study on different operation procedure for hysterectomy].
Huang XY; Fang SH; Wang MZ; Liu ZC; Zhang SY; Chen QB
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 40(10):652-5. PubMed ID: 16277891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical assessment for three routes of hysterectomy.
Zhu L; Lang JH; Liu CY; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Fan R
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 19302739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of different surgical approaches on quality of life and cost-consequence].
Leng JH; Lang JH; Li HJ; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Zhu L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 15196413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative assessment by magnetic resonance imaging is useful for planning the treatment of an enlarged uterus by total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Hatta K; Terai Y; Okuda K; Nakamura Y; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Hayashi A; Yamashita Y; Ohmichi M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Apr; 39(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 23379476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis of 216 cases of total laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Yao SZ; Chen SQ; Xie HZ; Niu G; Chen YQ; Liu DQ; Huang JZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 40(9):595-7. PubMed ID: 16202313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
Schwartz RO
J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative outcomes after total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with fast-track open hysterectomy - a retrospective case-control study.
Pather S; Loadsman JA; Mansfield C; Rao A; Arora V; Philp S; Carter J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Oct; 51(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 21810085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of selective uterine artery double ligation at the isthmic level of uterus and bipolar uterine artery coagulation in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Song JY; Hwang SJ; Kim MJ; Jo HH; Kim SY; Choi KE; Kwon DJ; Lew YO; Kim JH; Lim YT; Kim JH; Kim EJ; Kim MR
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2010 Aug; 19(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 20642388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of three subcategories of laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Rong CH; Shen K; Lang JH; Yang JX; Wu M; Pan LY; Leng JH
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2007 Jun; 29(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 17633474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
