169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20598136)
21. Dosimetric comparison study between intensity modulated radiation therapy and three-dimensional conformal proton therapy for pelvic bone marrow sparing in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Song WY; Huh SN; Liang Y; White G; Nichols RC; Watkins WT; Mundt AJ; Mell LK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 11(4):3255. PubMed ID: 21081882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Small bowel protection in IMRT for rectal cancer : A dosimetric study on supine vs. prone position.
Koeck J; Kromer K; Lohr F; Baack T; Siebenlist K; Mai S; Büttner S; Fleckenstein J; Wenz F
Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Jul; 193(7):578-588. PubMed ID: 28220185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Modeling the target dose fall-off in IMRT and VMAT planning techniques for cervical SBRT.
Brito Delgado A; Cohen D; Eng TY; Stanley DN; Shi Z; Charlton M; Gutiérrez AN
Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29223302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Understanding the impact of pelvic organ motion on dose delivered to target volumes during IMRT for cervical cancer.
Eminowicz G; Rompokos V; Stacey C; Hall L; McCormack M
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Jan; 122(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 27863962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Feng CH; Hasan Y; Kopec M; Al-Hallaq HA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):76-89. PubMed ID: 27685108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of three-dimensional versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques to treat breast and axillary level III and supraclavicular nodes in a prone versus supine position.
Sethi RA; No HS; Jozsef G; Ko JP; Formenti SC
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21993404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces small bowel, rectum, and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and para-aortic irradiation.
Portelance L; Chao KS; Grigsby PW; Bennet H; Low D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Sep; 51(1):261-6. PubMed ID: 11516876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intensity modulated proton beam radiation for brachytherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Clivio A; Kluge A; Cozzi L; Köhler C; Neumann O; Vanetti E; Wlodarczyk W; Marnitz S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 24119834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Small bowel displacement system-assisted intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Huh SJ; Kang MK; Han Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 15099953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of patient positioning on dose-volume histogram and normal tissue complication probability for small bowel and bladder in patients receiving pelvic irradiation: a prospective study using a 3D planning system and a radiobiological model.
Koelbl O; Richter S; Flentje M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1193-8. PubMed ID: 10613312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Wali L; Helal A; Darwesh R; Attar M
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(3):473-483. PubMed ID: 30958322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The normal tissue sparing obtained with simultaneous treatment of pelvic lymph nodes and bladder using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Søndergaard J; Høyer M; Petersen JB; Wright P; Grau C; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 18759144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A treatment planning study of prone vs. supine positions for locally advanced rectal carcinoma : Comparison of 3‑dimensional conformal radiotherapy, tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Scobioala S; Kittel C; Niermann P; Wolters H; Susek KH; Haverkamp U; Eich HT
Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Nov; 194(11):975-984. PubMed ID: 29855667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer After Conservative Surgery.
Zhang F; Wang Y; Xu W; Jiang H; Liu Q; Gao J; Yao B; Hou J; He H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 25311257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].
Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Dosimetric comparison between the intensity modulated radiotherapy with fixed field and Rapid Arc of cervix cancer].
Renard-Oldrini S; Brunaud C; Huger S; Marchesi V; Tournier-Rangeard L; Bouzid D; Harter V; Peiffert D
Cancer Radiother; 2012 May; 16(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 22498094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetric comparison of combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy versus IMRT alone for pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies.
Milby AB; Both S; Ingram M; Lin LL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e477-84. PubMed ID: 22177626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A margin-of-the-day online adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy strategy for cervical cancer provides superior treatment accuracy compared to clinically recommended margins: a dosimetric evaluation.
Ahmad R; Bondar L; Voet P; Mens JW; Quint S; Dhawtal G; Heijmen B; Hoogeman M
Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1430-6. PubMed ID: 23902275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
