BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20598456)

  • 21. Risk analysis in radiation treatment: application of a new taxonomic structure.
    Ekaette EU; Lee RC; Cooke DL; Kelly KL; Dunscombe PB
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Sep; 80(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 16884798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying Predictive Factors for Incident Reports in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy.
    Elnahal SM; Blackford A; Smith K; Souranis AN; Briner V; McNutt TR; DeWeese TL; Wright JL; Terezakis SA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Apr; 94(5):993-9. PubMed ID: 27026305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Balancing the evolution of radiotherapy quality assurance: in reference to Ford et al.
    Klein EE
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(3):664-6. PubMed ID: 19480967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modern palliative radiation treatment: do complexity and workload contribute to medical errors?
    D'Souza N; Holden L; Robson S; Mah K; Di Prospero L; Wong CS; Chow E; Spayne J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Sep; 84(1):e43-8. PubMed ID: 22713835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting Radiation Therapy Process Reliability Using Voluntary Incident Learning System Data.
    Howell C; Tracton G; Amos A; Chera B; Marks LB; Mazur LM
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Mar; 9(2):e210-e217. PubMed ID: 30529794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The growth of radiation oncology in mainland China during the last 10 years.
    Yin W; Chen B; Tian F; Yu Y; Kong FM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Mar; 70(3):795-8. PubMed ID: 18262091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Increased patient safety with an Internet-based reporting system.
    Keistinen T; Kinnunen M
    World Hosp Health Serv; 2008; 44(2):37-9. PubMed ID: 18795505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evaluation of departmental radiation oncology incident reports: anticipating a national reporting system.
    Terezakis SA; Harris KM; Ford E; Michalski J; DeWeese T; Santanam L; Mutic S; Gay H
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(4):919-23. PubMed ID: 23265568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The action group patient safety: motivation - foundation - current status].
    Weise K; Niethard FU
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Dec; 148(6):639-40. PubMed ID: 21161868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality Assurance with Plan Veto: reincarnation of a record and verify system and its potential value.
    Noel CE; Gutti V; Bosch W; Mutic S; Ford E; Terezakis S; Santanam L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):1161-6. PubMed ID: 24661669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Significance of using DICOM communication standard in quality assurance in radiation oncology - an institutional experience.
    Tobias P; Vrana D; Cwiertka K; Gremlica D; Slampa P
    J BUON; 2013; 18(4):1045-7. PubMed ID: 24344036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The management of radiation treatment error through incident learning.
    Clark BG; Brown RJ; Ploquin JL; Kind AL; Grimard L
    Radiother Oncol; 2010 Jun; 95(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 20400189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adverse Events Involving Radiation Oncology Medical Devices: Comprehensive Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Data, 1991 to 2015.
    Connor MJ; Marshall DC; Moiseenko V; Moore K; Cervino L; Atwood T; Sanghvi P; Mundt AJ; Pawlicki T; Recht A; Hattangadi-Gluth JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jan; 97(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 27979446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evolution of computerized radiotherapy in radiation oncology: potential problems and solutions.
    Levitt SH; Perez CA; Hui S; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Mar; 70(4):978-86. PubMed ID: 18313523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [From the concept of guilt to the value-free notification of errors in medicine. Risks, errors and patient safety].
    Haller U; Welti S; Haenggi D; Fink D
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2005 Jun; 45(3):147-60. PubMed ID: 15990440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tools for developing a quality management program: proactive tools (process mapping, value stream mapping, fault tree analysis, and failure mode and effects analysis).
    Rath F
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S187-90. PubMed ID: 18406925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The safety of Australian healthcare: 10 years after QAHCS.
    Wilson RM; Van Der Weyden MB
    Med J Aust; 2005 Mar; 182(6):260-1. PubMed ID: 15777136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Critical incident reporting system in emergency medicine.
    Kram R
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2008 Apr; 21(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 18443496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electronic reporting to improve patient safety.
    Tuttle D; Holloway R; Baird T; Sheehan B; Skelton WK
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Aug; 13(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15289631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality assurance of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: toward improvement of patient safety and quality of care.
    Ishikura S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Nov; 38(11):723-9. PubMed ID: 18952706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.