These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20598507)

  • 1. Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of hibernating myocardium in ischemic cardiomyopathy: preliminary qualitative and quantitative results.
    Chelliah RK; Hickman M; Kinsey C; Burden L; Senior R
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Aug; 23(8):840-7. PubMed ID: 20598507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with medium probability of coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction: comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with 99mTc single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Senior R; Lepper W; Pasquet A; Chung G; Hoffman R; Vanoverschelde JL; Cerqueira M; Kaul S
    Am Heart J; 2004 Jun; 147(6):1100-5. PubMed ID: 15199362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography.
    Lipiec P; Wejner-Mik P; Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Kuśmierek J; Płachcińska A; Szumiński R; Peruga JZ; Kasprzak JD
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Aug; 21(8):941-7. PubMed ID: 18385014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between myocardial contrast echocardiography and single-photon emission computed tomography for predicting transmurality of acute myocardial infarction.
    Hayat SA; Janardhanan R; Moon JC; Pennell DJ; Senior R
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 97(12):1718-21. PubMed ID: 16765120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between myocardial contrast echocardiography and (99m)technetium sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography determined myocardial viability in predicting hard cardiac events following acute myocardial infarction.
    Dwivedi G; Janardhanan R; Hayat SA; Lim TK; Senior R
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1184-8. PubMed ID: 19840559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Location of myocardium at risk in patients with first-time ST-elevation infarction: comparison among single photon emission computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and electrocardiography.
    Ubachs JF; Engblom H; Hedström E; Selvester RH; Knippenberg SA; Wagner GS; Gorgels AP; Arheden H
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 19100566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resting myocardial blood flow, coronary flow reserve, and contractile reserve in hibernating myocardium: implications for using resting myocardial contrast echocardiography vs. dobutamine echocardiography for the detection of hibernating myocardium.
    Hickman M; Chelliah R; Burden L; Senior R
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Oct; 11(9):756-62. PubMed ID: 20488815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction.
    Ibrahim T; Bülow HP; Hackl T; Hörnke M; Nekolla SG; Breuer M; Schömig A; Schwaiger M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 49(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 17222732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real time myocardial contrast echocardiography during supine bicycle stress and continuous infusion of contrast agent. Cutoff values for myocardial contrast replenishment discriminating abnormal myocardial perfusion.
    Miszalski-Jamka T; Kuntz-Hehner S; Schmidt H; Hammerstingl C; Tiemann K; Ghanem A; Troatz C; Lüderitz B; Omran H
    Echocardiography; 2007 Jul; 24(6):638-48. PubMed ID: 17584204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Usefulness of parametric imaging-based quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting the functional recovery of akinetic segments following primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction patients].
    Serra V; Pérez de Isla L; Zamorano J; Almería C; Rodrigo JL; Pérez M; Florit J; Azcona L; Hernández RA; Macaya C
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):649-56. PubMed ID: 15970120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for pharmacologic stress testing: is quantitative estimation of myocardial blood flow reserve necessary?
    Korosoglou G; da Silva KG; Labadze N; Dubart AE; Hansen A; Rosenberg M; Zehelein J; Kuecherer H
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2004 Jan; 17(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14712180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation of nonrevascularized human hibernating and chronically stunned myocardium to long-term chronic myocardial ischemia.
    Wiggers H; Nielsen SS; Holdgaard P; Flø C; Nørrelund H; Halbirk M; Nielsen TT; Egeblad H; Rehling M; Bøtker HE
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 98(12):1574-80. PubMed ID: 17145213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to cardiac scintigraphy to identify nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Yokokawa M; Tada H; Toyama T; Koyama K; Naito S; Oshima S; Taniguchi K
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S57-62. PubMed ID: 19250113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of multidetector CT with F-18-FDG-PET and SPECT in the assessment of myocardial viability in patients with myocardial infarction: a preliminary study.
    Lee IH; Choe YH; Lee KH; Jeon ES; Choi JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 18849129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of vasodilator stress myocardial contrast echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis of ischemic versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
    Mor-Avi V; Koch R; Holper EM; Goonewardena S; Coon PD; Min JK; Fedson S; Ward RP; Lang RM
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 May; 21(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 18187290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical relevance of hibernating myocardium in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.
    Schinkel AF; Bax JJ; Delgado V; Poldermans D; Rahimtoola SH
    Am J Med; 2010 Nov; 123(11):978-86. PubMed ID: 21035587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hibernating myocardium: diagnosis and patient outcomes.
    Schinkel AF; Bax JJ; Poldermans D; Elhendy A; Ferrari R; Rahimtoola SH
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 32(7):375-410. PubMed ID: 17560992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of residual infarct-related coronary artery stenosis and multivessel disease after thrombolysis: comparison between myocardial contrast echocardiography and single photon emission computed tomography.
    Dwivedi G; Janardhanan R; Hayat S; Senior R
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 May; 19(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 16644439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-time myocardial perfusion imaging for pharmacologic stress testing: added value to single photon emission computed tomography.
    Korosoglou G; Dubart AE; DaSilva KG; Labadze N; Hardt S; Hansen A; Bekeredjian R; Zugck C; Zehelein J; Katus HA; Kuecherer H
    Am Heart J; 2006 Jan; 151(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 16368304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the optimal clinical technique for measurement of left ventricular volume after myocardial infarction? A comparative study of 3-dimensional echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chan J; Jenkins C; Khafagi F; Du L; Marwick TH
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Feb; 19(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 16455424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.