484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20598590)
1. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of bridge design on stress distribution in bone tissues surrounding fixtures of osseointegrated implants in the lower molar region.
Arataki T; Adachi Y; Kishi M
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 9927906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study.
Meriç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; Ozden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jan; 70(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 21732740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis.
Canay S; Hersek N; Akpinar I; Aşik Z
Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):591-8. PubMed ID: 9180415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Sato T; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 9509784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
