These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2059876)

  • 1. In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.
    Rencken ML; Murano R; Drinkwater BL; Chesnut CH
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Apr; 48(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 2059876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
    Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems for spinal bone mineral measurement.
    Lai KC; Goodsitt MM; Murano R; Chesnut CH
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1992 Mar; 50(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 1617493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation and application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density in rabbit vertebrae.
    Norris SA; Pettifor JM; Gray DA; Biscardi A; Buffenstein R
    J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10917741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.
    Trevisan C; Gandolini GG; Sibilla P; Penotti M; Caraceni MP; Ortolani S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1373-82. PubMed ID: 1481723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of rates of bone loss from the spine measured using two manufacturers' densitometers.
    Peel NF; Eastell R
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Nov; 10(11):1796-801. PubMed ID: 8592958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Densitometer-Specific Differences in the Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score.
    Mazzetti G; Berger C; Leslie WD; Hans D; Langsetmo L; Hanley DA; Kovacs CS; Prior JC; Kaiser SM; Davison KS; Josse R; Papaioannou A; Adachi JR; Goltzman D; Morin SN;
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 28034592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Measurement With 3 Hologic Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Modes.
    Yu W; Zhang Z; Pan W; Guan W; Lin Q; Xia W; Li T; Hsieh E
    J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(4):645-650. PubMed ID: 33504451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
    Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instrument performance in bone density testing at five Australian centres.
    Khan KM; Henzell SL; Broderick C; Prince RL; Saul A; Lomman J; Wark JD
    Aust N Z J Med; 1997 Oct; 27(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 9404582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anomalies in the measurement of changes in total-body bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during weight change.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Cowen S; Freeman CP
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Nov; 12(11):1908-21. PubMed ID: 9383696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Reginster JY; Deroisy R; Zegels B; Jupsin I; Albert A; Franchimont P
    Clin Rheumatol; 1995 Mar; 14(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 7789060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender disparity in BMD conversion: a comparison between Lunar and Hologic densitometers.
    Ganda K; Nguyen TV; Pocock N
    Arch Osteoporos; 2014; 9():180. PubMed ID: 25527404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Effect of very dense artifacts on Hologic and general electric bone densitometry results".
    Morgan SL; Krueger D; Bassler J; Burroughs L; Borchardt G; Yester M; Binkley N; Redden D
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 May; 15(1):77. PubMed ID: 32436138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine.
    Hansen MA; Hassager C; Overgaard K; Marslew U; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Jul; 31(7):1156-62. PubMed ID: 2362194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of longitudinal measurements in the spine and proximal femur using lunar and hologic instruments.
    Pocock NA; Noakes KA; Griffiths M; Bhalerao N; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA; Freund J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Dec; 12(12):2113-8. PubMed ID: 9421245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
    Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
    Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid small-animal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using digital radiography.
    Holdsworth DW; Thornton MM; Drost D; Watson PH; Fraher LJ; Hodsman AB
    J Bone Miner Res; 2000 Dec; 15(12):2451-7. PubMed ID: 11127209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.