132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20599965)
61. Assessing the Efficacy of Synthetic Optic Disc Images for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Using Deep Learning.
Chaurasia AK; MacGregor S; Craig JE; Mackey DA; Hewitt AW
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Jun; 13(6):1. PubMed ID: 38829624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. RimNet: A Deep Neural Network Pipeline for Automated Identification of the Optic Disc Rim.
Rasheed HA; Davis T; Morales E; Fei Z; Grassi L; De Gainza A; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J
Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Mar; 3(1):100244. PubMed ID: 36545262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Accurate, fast, data efficient and interpretable glaucoma diagnosis with automated spatial analysis of the whole cup to disc profile.
MacCormick IJC; Williams BM; Zheng Y; Li K; Al-Bander B; Czanner S; Cheeseman R; Willoughby CE; Brown EN; Spaeth GL; Czanner G
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209409. PubMed ID: 30629635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Meta-analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies Identifies Novel Loci Associated With Optic Disc Morphology.
Springelkamp H; Mishra A; Hysi PG; Gharahkhani P; Höhn R; Khor CC; Cooke Bailey JN; Luo X; Ramdas WD; Vithana E; Koh V; Yazar S; Xu L; Forward H; Kearns LS; Amin N; Iglesias AI; Sim KS; van Leeuwen EM; Demirkan A; van der Lee S; Loon SC; Rivadeneira F; Nag A; Sanfilippo PG; Schillert A; de Jong PT; Oostra BA; Uitterlinden AG; Hofman A; ; Zhou T; Burdon KP; Spector TD; Lackner KJ; Saw SM; Vingerling JR; Teo YY; Pasquale LR; Wolfs RC; Lemij HG; Tai ES; Jonas JB; Cheng CY; Aung T; Jansonius NM; Klaver CC; Craig JE; Young TL; Haines JL; MacGregor S; Mackey DA; Pfeiffer N; Wong TY; Wiggs JL; Hewitt AW; van Duijn CM; Hammond CJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 39(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25631615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Comparison of posterior vitreous detachment-related and glaucomatous optic disc hemorrhage.
Jin C; Park GS; Kim KN; Song MY; Hwang YH
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):5011. PubMed ID: 36973533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A Randomized Trial to Increase the Assessment Accuracy of Glaucoma and Optic Disc Characteristics by Orthoptists.
Scheetz J; Koklanis K; McGuinness M; Long M; Morris ME
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2019; 39(3):161-167. PubMed ID: 31318721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Rim-to-Disc Ratio Outperforms Cup-to-Disc Ratio for Glaucoma Prescreening.
Kumar JRH; Seelamantula CS; Kamath YS; Jampala R
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7099. PubMed ID: 31068608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Crowdsourcing to Evaluate Fundus Photographs for the Presence of Glaucoma.
Wang X; Mudie LI; Baskaran M; Cheng CY; Alward WL; Friedman DS; Brady CJ
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jun; 26(6):505-510. PubMed ID: 28319525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Crowdsourcing as a screening tool to detect clinical features of glaucomatous optic neuropathy from digital photography.
Mitry D; Peto T; Hayat S; Blows P; Morgan J; Khaw KT; Foster PJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117401. PubMed ID: 25692287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Technical procedures and software for magnification-corrected morphometry of optic disk photography.
Brigatti L; Bottoni F; Miglior S; Orzalesi N
Ophthalmologica; 1991; 202(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 2017330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Observer experience and Cup:Disc ratio assessment.
Hanson S; Krishnan SK; Phillips J
Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Oct; 78(10):701-5. PubMed ID: 11700963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Photogrammetric analysis of volume asymmetry of the optic nerve head cup in normal, hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes.
Portney GL
Am J Ophthalmol; 1975 Jul; 80(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1155549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparison of different measuring methods in the assessment of the ISNT rule and its variants in a normal population: A cross-sectional study.
Soares I; Gravito-Soares M; Gravito-Soares E; Vaz S; Almeida V
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1190-1202. PubMed ID: 37243449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Glaucoma screening: the importance of combining test data.
Harper RA; Reeves BC
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):537-43. PubMed ID: 10472959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Joint optic disc and optic cup segmentation based on boundary prior and adversarial learning.
Luo L; Xue D; Pan F; Feng X
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Jun; 16(6):905-914. PubMed ID: 33963969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. [Quantitation of the "optic cup" and its clinical application. Part IV. Statistical investigation of the "Quantitative Disc Pattern" as a screening device for glaucoma (author's transl)].
Shiose Y
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1975 Sep; 79(9):1139-46. PubMed ID: 1239927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Sensitivity of the electronic subtraction method in evaluation of simulated optic disc changes.
Alanko HI; Airaksinen PL
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1982 Apr; 60(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 6753456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Recognition of Glaucomatous Fundus Images Using Machine Learning Methods Based on Optic Nerve Head Topographic Features.
Wu CW; Huang TY; Liou YC; Chen SH; Wu KY; Tseng HY
J Glaucoma; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38546234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [An equidensitometric procedure for the objective evaluation of the cup/disc ratio (author's transl)].
Rochels R
Ophthalmologica; 1980; 180(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 7207967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [Quantitative analysis of "optic cup" and its clinical application. III. A new diagnostic criterion for glaucoma using "quantitative disc pattern" (Shiose) (author's transl)].
Shiose Y
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1975 May; 79(5):445-61. PubMed ID: 1172352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
