193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20600078)
1. Efficiency of different strategies to detect autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens.
Almeida González D; Cabrera de León A; Rodríguez Pérez Mdel C; Brito Díaz B; González Hernández A; García García D; Vázquez Moncholi C; Aguirre Jaime A
J Immunol Methods; 2010 Aug; 360(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20600078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effective detection of non-antidouble-stranded DNA antinuclear antibody specificities in daily clinical practice.
Vos PA; Bast EJ; Derksen RH
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 16368728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Autoantibody detection with indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells: starting serum dilutions for systemic rheumatic diseases.
González DA; León AC; Varela AR; García MG; Rahola Mde S; Pérez Mdel C; Hernández AG; Falcón MJ; Díaz BB
Immunol Lett; 2011 Oct; 140(1-2):30-5. PubMed ID: 21684306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen for the detection of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods.
Desplat-Jego S; Bardin N; Larida B; Sanmarco M
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Aug; 1109():245-55. PubMed ID: 17785313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison between line immunoassay (LIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the determination of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigenes (ENA) with reference to other laboratory results and clinical features].
Maclachlan D; Vogt P; Wu X; Rose L; Tyndall A; Hasler P
Z Rheumatol; 2002 Oct; 61(5):534-44. PubMed ID: 12399881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different test systems for simultaneous autoantibody detection in connective tissue diseases.
Eissfeller P; Sticherling M; Scholz D; Hennig K; Lüttich T; Motz M; Kromminga A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Jun; 1050():327-39. PubMed ID: 16014549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection and identification of significant ANAs in previously determined ANA negative samples.
Kidd K; Cusi K; Mueller R; Goodner M; Boyes B; Hoy E
Clin Lab; 2005; 51(9-10):517-21. PubMed ID: 16285474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From ANA to ENA: how to proceed?
Damoiseaux JG; Tervaert JW
Autoimmun Rev; 2006 Jan; 5(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 16338206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens by EIA and IF techniques.
Alem M; Moghadam S; Malki J; Zaidi A; Nayak N; Li TM
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1997 Sep; 29(7):188, 191-4. PubMed ID: 9373708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a new screening strategy for anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies.
Van Praet JT; Vander Cruyssen B; Bonroy C; Smith V; Delanghe J; De Keyser F
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2009; 27(6):971-6. PubMed ID: 20149314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Detection of anti-ENA and anti-dsDNA antibodies using line immunoassay in systemic autoimmune diseases].
Kim JM; Ihm CH; Sin DH; Ihm MK; Sim SC
Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 28(5):353-61. PubMed ID: 18971616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Autoantibodies].
Ishihara Y
Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):562-9. PubMed ID: 16026086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory screening of connective tissue diseases by a new automated ENA screening assay (EliA Symphony) in clinically defined patients.
González C; García-Berrocal B; Pérez M; Navajo JA; Herraez O; González-Buitrago JM
Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Sep; 359(1-2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15894301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of antinuclear antibodies: comparative evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence methods.
Homburger HA; Cahen YD; Griffiths J; Jacob GL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):993-9. PubMed ID: 9822128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay methods for the determination of antinuclear antibodies].
Yilmaz O; Karaman M; Ergon MC; Bahar IH; Yuluğ N
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004; 38(1-2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15293906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and line immunoassay methods': four years' data from Turkey.
Sener AG; Afsar I; Demirci M
APMIS; 2014 Dec; 122(12):1167-70. PubMed ID: 24735346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiplex assessment of non-organ-specific autoantibodies with a novel microbead-based immunoassay.
Grossmann K; Roggenbuck D; Schröder C; Conrad K; Schierack P; Sack U
Cytometry A; 2011 Feb; 79(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 21265005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a novel line-blot immunoassay for the detection of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens.
Damoiseaux J; Boesten K; Giesen J; Austen J; Tervaert JW
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Jun; 1050():340-7. PubMed ID: 16014550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Italian multicentre study for application of a diagnostic algorithm in autoantibody testing for autoimmune rheumatic disease: conclusive results.
Bonaguri C; Melegari A; Ballabio A; Parmeggiani M; Russo A; Battistelli L; Aloe R; Trenti T; Lippi G
Autoimmun Rev; 2011 Nov; 11(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21741498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of autoantibodies (ANA, anti ds-DNA, ENA, IMF) and rheumatic syndromes in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases.
Chloraki-Bobota A; Megalakaki C; Repousis P; Chalkiopoulou I; Lalaki I; Trafalis DT; Athanassiou AE; Mitsouli-Mentzikof C
J BUON; 2006; 11(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 17309182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
