These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20600193)

  • 1. Hearing loss severity: impaired processing of formant transition duration.
    Coez A; Belin P; Bizaguet E; Ferrary E; Zilbovicius M; Samson Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3057-61. PubMed ID: 20600193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Verhey JL; Anweiler AK; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 16717019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An acoustic and perceptual study of final stops produced by profoundly hearing impaired adolescents.
    Khouw E; Ciocca V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):172-85. PubMed ID: 16533082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 19922784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Broadband auditory stream segregation by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Valentine S; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1341-52. PubMed ID: 18664686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of stimulus duration on perception of Turkish vowels in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.
    Kiliç MA; Yildirim I; Okur E; Oğüt F; Serbetçioğlu B
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):675-80. PubMed ID: 17118910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of synthetic speech sounds by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Godfrey JJ; Millay KK
    J Aud Res; 1980 Jul; 20(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 7347740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formant transition duration and speech recognition in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Smith SJ; Aldridge PL; Stewart SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2822-5. PubMed ID: 9165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of rapid spectral change in speech by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Godfrey JJ; Millay K
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 659292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reaction time to 1- and 4-kHz tones as a function of sensation level in listeners with normal hearing.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16825891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dreisbach LE; Leek MR; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):910-21. PubMed ID: 16378482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of fast-acting compression on modulation detection interference for normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Shen Y; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3654-65. PubMed ID: 20550264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.