These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20600287)

  • 41. Within-subject mediation analysis for experimental data in cognitive psychology and neuroscience.
    Vuorre M; Bolger N
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):2125-2143. PubMed ID: 29247385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?
    Lazic SE
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 11():5. PubMed ID: 20074371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Statistical strategies for averaging EC50 from multiple dose-response experiments.
    Jiang X; Kopp-Schneider A
    Arch Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 89(11):2119-27. PubMed ID: 25294322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.
    Alger BE
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8432-8438. PubMed ID: 36351823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluating order-constrained hypotheses for circular data from a between-within subjects design.
    Baayen C; Klugkist I
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 25046448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Introducing analysis of means to medical statistics.
    Mohammed MA; Holder R
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Jun; 21(6):529-32. PubMed ID: 22511730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The future of biostatistics: expecting the unexpected.
    van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(24):2773-84. PubMed ID: 9483713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Medical statistics--what, when, why, how, which.
    Dunne T; Scott L
    S Afr Med J; 1996 Sep; 86(9):1079-80. PubMed ID: 8888773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Beyond t test and ANOVA: applications of mixed-effects models for more rigorous statistical analysis in neuroscience research.
    Yu Z; Guindani M; Grieco SF; Chen L; Holmes TC; Xu X
    Neuron; 2022 Jan; 110(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 34784504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Scientific Hypothesis-Testing Strengthens Neuroscience Research.
    Alger BE
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 32641499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Planned missing data designs and methods: Options for strengthening inference, increasing research efficiency and improving animal welfare in ecological and evolutionary research.
    Noble DWA; Nakagawa S
    Evol Appl; 2021 Aug; 14(8):1958-1968. PubMed ID: 34429741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Direct interaction with no correlation: an experimental pitfall in neural systems.
    JanuĊĦonis S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012; 206(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 22405940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence.
    Keysers C; Gazzola V; Wagenmakers EJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 23(7):788-799. PubMed ID: 32601411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Simulation modelling analysis for small sets of single-subject data collected over time.
    Borckardt JJ; Nash MR
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2014; 24(3-4):492-506. PubMed ID: 24641472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Meta analytical structural equation modeling: comments on issues with current methods and viable alternatives.
    Yuan KH
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 27286905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Statistical primer: performing repeated-measures analysis.
    Hickey GL; Mokhles MM; Chambers DJ; Kolamunnage-Dona R
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 26(4):539-544. PubMed ID: 29596693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. When neuroscience met clinical pathology: partitioning experimental variation to aid data interpretation in neuroscience.
    Jeffery ND; Bate ST; Safayi S; Howard MA; Moon L; Jeffery U
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 47(5):371-379. PubMed ID: 29380453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An entomologist guide to demystify pseudoreplication: data analysis of field studies with design constraints.
    Chaves LF
    J Med Entomol; 2010 May; 47(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 20496574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Statistical approaches to toxicological data.
    Hoel DG
    Environ Health Perspect; 1979 Oct; 32():267-71. PubMed ID: 540599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pseudoreplication is (still) a problem.
    Freeberg TM; Lucas JR
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):450-1. PubMed ID: 19929114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.