These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20600698)

  • 1. Within-session modulation of timed anticipatory responding: when to start responding.
    Balci F; Ludvig EA; Brunner D
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):204-6. PubMed ID: 20600698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reward magnitude and timing in pigeons.
    Ludvig EA; Balci F; Spetch ML
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 21244854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acquisition of peak responding: what is learned?
    Balci F; Gallistel CR; Allen BD; Frank KM; Gibson JM; Brunner D
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 18950695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fewer peak trials per session facilitate acquisition of peak responding despite elimination of response rate differences.
    Kaiser DH
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 18793706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 19429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of timing and classical conditioning.
    Holder MD; Roberts S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):172-93. PubMed ID: 4009120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pigeons learn signal-food intervals independently in a multiple peak procedure.
    Rice N; Grace RC; Kyonka EG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 24364669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Operant behavior in dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli): Effects of rate of reinforcement and reinforcer flavor variety.
    Lupfer-Johnson G; Murphy ES; Blackwell LC; LaCasse JL; Drummond S
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jun; 84(2):573-80. PubMed ID: 20188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavior maintained under fixed-interval and second-order schedules of cocaine or pentobarbital in rhesus monkeys.
    Johanson CE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1982 May; 221(2):384-93. PubMed ID: 7077533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Little and often? Maintaining continued performance in an automated T-maze for mice.
    Gaskill BN; Lucas JR; Pajor EA; Garner JP
    Behav Processes; 2011 Feb; 86(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 21187130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative anticipatory contrast: does it involve anticipation of an impending reward?
    Onishi BK; Xavier GF
    Behav Processes; 2011 Feb; 86(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 21187128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oscillations following periodic reinforcement.
    Monteiro T; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 18992793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single forebrain neurons represent interval timing and reward amount during response scheduling.
    Kalenscher T; Ohmann T; Windmann S; Freund N; Güntürkün O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 24(10):2923-31. PubMed ID: 17156215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Naltrexone effects on ethanol reward and discrimination in C57BL/6 mice.
    Middaugh LD; Kelley BM; Cuison ER; Groseclose CH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1999 Mar; 23(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 10195818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of responding maintained under second-order schedules of intramuscular cocaine injection or food presentation in squirrel monkeys.
    Katz JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 117071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Schedule-controlled operant behavior of rats following oral administration of perchloroethylene: time course and relationship to blood and brain solvent levels.
    Warren DA; Reigle TG; Muralidhara S; Dallas CE
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1996 Mar; 47(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 8600288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixed-ratio responding under second-order schedules of food presentation or cocaine injection.
    Goldberg SR; Kelleher RT; Goldberg DM
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Jul; 218(1):271-81. PubMed ID: 7241384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcer concentration effects on a fixed-interval schedule.
    Blomeley FJ; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15182926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.