97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2060094)
1. Effects of drive train stimulus intensity on ventricular refractoriness in humans.
Langberg JJ; Calkins H; Sousa J; el-Atassi R; Morady F
Circulation; 1991 Jul; 84(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 2060094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of increased drive-train stimulus intensity on dispersion of ventricular refractoriness.
Goldberger JJ; Smith JR; Kim YH; Damle RS; Kadish AH
Circulation; 1995 Aug; 92(4):875-80. PubMed ID: 7641368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the intertrain pause on the ventricular effective refractory period measured by the extrastimulus technique.
Morady F; Kadish AH; Rosenheck S; Schmaltz S; Debuitleir M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Apr; 13(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 1692123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ventricular refractory periods determined by incremental and decremental scanning of an extrastimulus.
Morady F; Kadish AH; Kushner JA; Toivonen LK; Schmaltz S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Apr; 12(4 Pt 1):546-54. PubMed ID: 2470036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of high intensity drive train stimulation on dispersion of atrial refractoriness: role of autonomic nervous system.
Yu WC; Chen SA; Chiang CE; Tai CT; Lee SH; Chiou CW; Ueng KC; Wen ZC; Chen YJ; Huang JL; Feng AN; Chang MS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Apr; 29(5):1000-6. PubMed ID: 9120151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of rate on prolongation of ventricular refractoriness by quinidine in humans.
Rosenheck S; Sousa J; Calkins H; Kadish AH; Morady F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Nov; 13(11 Pt 1):1379-84. PubMed ID: 1701891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The maximum effect of an increase in rate on human ventricular refractoriness.
Morady F; Kadish AH; Toivonen LK; Kushner JA; Schmaltz S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Dec; 11(12):2223-34. PubMed ID: 2463610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of selective stellate ganglion manipulation on ventricular refractoriness and excitability.
García-Calvo R; Chorro FJ; Sendra M; Alberola A; Sanchis J; Navarro J; Valentín V; López-Merino V; Such L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1492-503. PubMed ID: 1383961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of stimulus intensity on atrial refractoriness and sinus node recovery.
Ehlert FA; Damle RS; Goldberger JJ; Kadish AH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Jun; 5(6):485-95. PubMed ID: 8087293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term rapid ventricular pacing prolongs ventricular refractoriness in patients.
Krebs ME; Szwed JM; Shinn T; Miles WM; Zipes DP
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Oct; 9(10):1036-42. PubMed ID: 9817555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The comparative effects of drive and test stimulus intensity on myocardial excitability and vulnerability.
Friedman HS; Wattanasuwan N; Sharafkhaneh A; Win M; Mallipeddi D; Khan IA; Dai CP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 23(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 10666757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Summation of excitation with a single conditioning stimulus in the canine heart.
Saihara S; Inoue H; Toda I; Usui M; Sugimoto T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 1689035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the ventricular effective refractory period different when determined by incremental versus decremental scanning?: the effect of pacing cycle length, d-sotalol, and levcromakalim.
Leerssen HM; Vos MA; den Dulk K; van der Zande J; Wellens HJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):2084-9. PubMed ID: 7845822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strength-interval curves in canine myocardium at very short cycle lengths.
Alferness C; Bayly PV; Krassowska W; Daubert JP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):876-81. PubMed ID: 7517522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Description of the strength-interval relation with external noninvasive pacing.
Luck JC; Grubb BP; Markel ML
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2031-7. PubMed ID: 1704588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of spatial separation of stimulation sites on ventricular refractoriness during programmed electrical stimulation.
Stevenson WG; Wiener I; Weiss JN
Am Heart J; 1987 Dec; 114(6):1396-9. PubMed ID: 3687693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in ventricular refractoriness after an extrastimulus: effects of prematurity, cycle length and procainamide.
Cain ME; Martin TC; Marchlinski FE; Josephson ME
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 52(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 6637852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human ventricular refractoriness: effects of increasing current.
Greenspan AM; Camardo JS; Horowitz LN; Spielman SR; Josephson ME
Am J Cardiol; 1981 Feb; 47(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 7468474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of an acute increase in atrial pressure on atrial refractoriness in humans.
Calkins H; el-Atassi R; Kalbfleisch S; Langberg J; Morady F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 1):1674-80. PubMed ID: 1279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Termination of ventricular tachycardia with ventricular stimulation: salutary effect of increased current strength.
Waxman HL; Cain ME; Greenspan AM; Josephson ME
Circulation; 1982 Apr; 65(4):800-4. PubMed ID: 7060259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
