152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20601461)
1. Nonlinear lymphangion pressure-volume relationship minimizes edema.
Venugopal AM; Stewart RH; Laine GA; Quick CM
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2010 Sep; 299(3):H876-82. PubMed ID: 20601461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First-order approximation for the pressure-flow relationship of spontaneously contracting lymphangions.
Quick CM; Venugopal AM; Dongaonkar RM; Laine GA; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2008 May; 294(5):H2144-9. PubMed ID: 18326809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulation of a chain of collapsible contracting lymphangions with progressive valve closure.
Bertram CD; Macaskill C; Moore JE
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jan; 133(1):011008. PubMed ID: 21186898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Lymphatic Vascular System: Does Nonuniform Lymphangion Length Limit Flow-Rate?
Bertram CD
J Biomech Eng; 2024 Sep; 146(9):. PubMed ID: 38558115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lymphangion coordination minimally affects mean flow in lymphatic vessels.
Venugopal AM; Stewart RH; Laine GA; Dongaonkar RM; Quick CM
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2007 Aug; 293(2):H1183-9. PubMed ID: 17468331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consequences of intravascular lymphatic valve properties: a study of contraction timing in a multi-lymphangion model.
Bertram CD; Macaskill C; Davis MJ; Moore JE
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2016 Apr; 310(7):H847-60. PubMed ID: 26747501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymphatic pump-conduit duality: contraction of postnodal lymphatic vessels inhibits passive flow.
Quick CM; Ngo BL; Venugopal AM; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2009 Mar; 296(3):H662-8. PubMed ID: 19122167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrinsic increase in lymphangion muscle contractility in response to elevated afterload.
Davis MJ; Scallan JP; Wolpers JH; Muthuchamy M; Gashev AA; Zawieja DC
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2012 Oct; 303(7):H795-808. PubMed ID: 22886407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parameter sensitivity analysis of a lumped-parameter model of a chain of lymphangions in series.
Jamalian S; Bertram CD; Richardson WJ; Moore JE
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2013 Dec; 305(12):H1709-17. PubMed ID: 24124185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal postnodal lymphatic network structure that maximizes active propulsion of lymph.
Venugopal AM; Quick CM; Laine GA; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2009 Feb; 296(2):H303-9. PubMed ID: 19028799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Network Scale Modeling of Lymph Transport and Its Effective Pumping Parameters.
Jamalian S; Davis MJ; Zawieja DC; Moore JE
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148384. PubMed ID: 26845031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.
Razavi MS; Nelson TS; Nepiyushchikh Z; Gleason RL; Dixon JB
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2017 Dec; 313(6):H1249-H1260. PubMed ID: 28778909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pump efficacy in a two-dimensional, fluid-structure interaction model of a chain of contracting lymphangions.
Elich H; Barrett A; Shankar V; Fogelson AL
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Oct; 20(5):1941-1968. PubMed ID: 34275062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mesenteric lymphatic vessels adapt to mesenteric venous hypertension by becoming weaker pumps.
Dongaonkar RM; Nguyen TL; Quick CM; Heaps CL; Hardy J; Laine GA; Wilson E; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2015 Mar; 308(5):R391-9. PubMed ID: 25519727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptation of mesenteric lymphatic vessels to prolonged changes in transmural pressure.
Dongaonkar RM; Nguyen TL; Quick CM; Hardy J; Laine GA; Wilson E; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2013 Jul; 305(2):H203-10. PubMed ID: 23666672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Independent and interactive effects of preload and afterload on the pump function of the isolated lymphangion.
Scallan JP; Wolpers JH; Muthuchamy M; Zawieja DC; Gashev AA; Davis MJ
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2012 Oct; 303(7):H809-24. PubMed ID: 22865389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Passive pressure-diameter relationship and structural composition of rat mesenteric lymphangions.
Rahbar E; Weimer J; Gibbs H; Yeh AT; Bertram CD; Davis MJ; Hill MA; Zawieja DC; Moore JE
Lymphat Res Biol; 2012 Dec; 10(4):152-63. PubMed ID: 23145980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal lymphatic vessel structure.
Venugopal AM; Stewart RH; Rajagopalan S; Laine GA; Quick CM
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2004; 2004():3700-3. PubMed ID: 17271097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contraction of collecting lymphatics: organization of pressure-dependent rate for multiple lymphangions.
Bertram CD; Macaskill C; Davis MJ; Moore JE
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Oct; 17(5):1513-1532. PubMed ID: 29948540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrinsic pump-conduit behavior of lymphangions.
Quick CM; Venugopal AM; Gashev AA; Zawieja DC; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2007 Apr; 292(4):R1510-8. PubMed ID: 17122333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
