These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 12239037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of perception in imaging: past and future. Krupinski EA Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):392-400. PubMed ID: 21978443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding and Confronting Our Mistakes: The Epidemiology of Error in Radiology and Strategies for Error Reduction. Bruno MA; Walker EA; Abujudeh HH Radiographics; 2015 Oct; 35(6):1668-76. PubMed ID: 26466178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation. Mello-Thoms C Acad Radiol; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12529023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heuristics and Cognitive Error in Medical Imaging. Itri JN; Patel SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 29528716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computing eye gaze metrics for the automatic assessment of radiographer performance during X-ray image interpretation. McLaughlin L; Bond R; Hughes C; McConnell J; McFadden S Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():11-21. PubMed ID: 28750903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents. Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixated and Not Fixated Regions of Mammograms: A Higher-Order Statistical Analysis of Visual Search Behavior. Mall S; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 28139426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpretive Error in Radiology. Waite S; Scott J; Gale B; Fuchs T; Kolla S; Reede D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):739-749. PubMed ID: 28026210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensory factors are insufficient to define the ocular saccade goal in complex visual fields. Lévy-Schoen A; Coëffé C; Jacobs AM Brain Behav Evol; 1989; 33(2-3):80-4. PubMed ID: 2758306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Carmody D Invest Radiol; 1978; 13(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 711391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of form across saccadic eye movements. Hayhoe M; Lachter J; Feldman J Perception; 1991; 20(3):393-402. PubMed ID: 1762882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informatics in radiology: what can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images? Drew T; Evans K; Võ ML; Jacobson FL; Wolfe JM Radiographics; 2013; 33(1):263-74. PubMed ID: 23104971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic approach to human error in radiology. Pescarini L; Inches I Radiol Med; 2006 Mar; 111(2):252-67. PubMed ID: 16671383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Embodied cognition and the perception-action link. Bridgeman B; Tseng P Phys Life Rev; 2011 Mar; 8(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 21257354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of image processing on chest radiograph interpretation and decision changes. Krupinski EA; Evanoff M; Ovitt T; Standen JR; Chu TX; Johnson J Acad Radiol; 1998 Feb; 5(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 9484539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]