These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20601708)
1. Increased hedonic differences despite increases in hedonic range. Zellner DA; Jones K; Morino J; Cogan ES; Jennings EM; Parker S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1261-5. PubMed ID: 20601708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. Russell PA Br J Psychol; 2003 Feb; 94(Pt 1):99-110. PubMed ID: 12648392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Categorization reduces the effect of context on hedonic preference. Zellner DA; Mattingly MC; Parker S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1228-32. PubMed ID: 19633338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Art in the eye of the beholder: the perception of art during monocular viewing. Finney GR; Heilman KM Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Mar; 21(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 18327016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization. Forsythe M; Zellner D; Cogan E; Parker S Perception; 2014; 43(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 24689132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pigeons can discriminate "good" and "bad" paintings by children. Watanabe S Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19533184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception, memory and aesthetics of indeterminate art. Ishai A; Fairhall SL; Pepperell R Brain Res Bull; 2007 Jul; 73(4-6):319-24. PubMed ID: 17562398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Labels affect both liking and preference: the better the stimuli, the bigger the preference. Zellner DA; Hoer K; Feldman J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2189-92. PubMed ID: 25239098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: differences in prohedonic and contra-hedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Riediger M; Schmiedek F; Wagner GG; Lindenberger U Psychol Sci; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1529-35. PubMed ID: 19891749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in reactions to paintings by male and female college students. Polzella DJ Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 11011895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implicit and explicit features of paintings. Marković S; Radonjić A Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):229-59. PubMed ID: 18534101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. As pleasure unfolds. Hedonic responses to tempting food. Hofmann W; van Koningsbruggen GM; Stroebe W; Ramanathan S; Aarts H Psychol Sci; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1863-70. PubMed ID: 21106885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The categorization effect in hedonic contrast: experts differ from novices. Rota LM; Zellner DA Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 17546750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preference for negative emotions. Västfjäll D; Gärling T Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):326-9. PubMed ID: 16768564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adults' preferences for side-of-hold as portrayed in paintings of the Madonna and Child. Harris LJ; Cardénas RA; Spradlin MP; Almerigi JB Laterality; 2009 Nov; 14(6):590-617. PubMed ID: 19340631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluative priming from subliminal emotional words: insights from event-related potentials and individual differences related to anxiety. Gibbons H Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):383-400. PubMed ID: 19328727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hedonic value of intentional action provides reinforcement for voluntary generation but not voluntary inhibition of action. Parkinson J; Haggard P Conscious Cogn; 2013 Dec; 22(4):1253-61. PubMed ID: 24021853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Following the masters: portrait viewing and appreciation is guided by selective detail. DiPaola S; Riebe C; Enns JT Perception; 2013; 42(6):608-30. PubMed ID: 24422244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. Hekkert P; Snelders D; van Wieringen PC Br J Psychol; 2003 Feb; 94(Pt 1):111-24. PubMed ID: 12648393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Activating health goals reduces (increases) hedonic evaluation of food brands for people who harbor highly positive (negative) affect toward them. Connell PM; Mayor LF Appetite; 2013 Jun; 65():159-64. PubMed ID: 23428938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]