196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20602883)
1. [Application values of four risk of malignancy indices in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses].
Lou HY; Meng H; Zhu QL; Zhang Q; Jiang YX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Jun; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20602883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the predictive performance of risk of malignancy indexes 1-4, HE4 and risk of malignancy algorithm in the triage of adnexal masses.
Hada A; Han LP; Chen Y; Hu QH; Yuan Y; Liu L
J Ovarian Res; 2020 Apr; 13(1):46. PubMed ID: 32334618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices; RMI 1-4 in borderline ovarian tumor.
Yenen MC; Alanbay I; Aktürk E; Ercan CM; Coksuer H; Karaşahin E; Ozan H; Dede M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22611957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Risk of Malignancy Index in daily clinical management of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Kluivers KB; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Massuger LF
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 19959215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of malignancy index in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses.
Ashrafgangooei T; Rezaeezadeh M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1727-30. PubMed ID: 22126553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of malignancy index in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses.
Andersen ES; Knudsen A; Rix P; Johansen B
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 12821350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of four malignancy risk indices in the preoperative evaluation of patients with pelvic masses.
Yamamoto Y; Yamada R; Oguri H; Maeda N; Fukaya T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jun; 144(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 19327881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation of the adapted Risk of Malignancy Index incorporating tumor size in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Zusterzeel PL; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Kluivers KB; Massuger LF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):422-5. PubMed ID: 21824712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A preliminary study: The sequential use of the risk malignancy index and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Qiu L; Yang F; Luo H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11536. PubMed ID: 30024542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A proposal for a new scoring system to evaluate pelvic masses: Pelvic Masses Score (PMS).
Rossi A; Braghin C; Soldano F; Isola M; Capodicasa V; Londero AP; Forzano L; Marchesoni D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jul; 157(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 21440361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of adnexal masses: correlation between clinical, ultrasound and histopathological findings.
Dotlić J; Terzić M; Likić I; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Oct; 68(10):861-6. PubMed ID: 22165752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The risk of malignancy index (RMI) in women with adnexal masses in Wales.
Abdulrahman GO; McKnight L; Lutchman Singh K
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 53(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 25286794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses.
Akdeniz N; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Kale A; Erdemoğlu M; Caca F
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 19480249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
