These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20603053)
1. Fixation preference tests for amblyopia: invaluable, useless, or somewhere in the middle? Wallace DK J AAPOS; 2010 Jun; 14(3):201-2. PubMed ID: 20603053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of binocular fixation preference for the diagnosis of strabismic amblyopia. Procianoy L; Procianoy E J AAPOS; 2010 Jun; 14(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 20418133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fixation preference test: reliability for the detection of amblyopia in patients with strabismus and interexaminer agreement. Erkan Turan K; Taylan Sekeroglu H; Karahan S; Sanac AS Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 37(6):1305-1310. PubMed ID: 27933481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ["Concomitant" strabismus in children]. Fontaine M; Luca F Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol; 1975 Apr; 35(4):369-96. PubMed ID: 130869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. False amblyopia prediction in strabismic patients by fixation preference testing correlates with contralateral ocular dominance. AlHarkan DH; Khan AO J AAPOS; 2014 Oct; 18(5):453-6. PubMed ID: 25266829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical experience with the Otago Photoscreener. Molteno AC; Sanderson GF; Hoare-Nairne J Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1985 Feb; 13(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 4015879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of the modified fixation preference test with the conventional test in strabismic patients]. Procianoy E; Procianoy L Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2012; 75(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 22760796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia. Hakim OM J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2007; 44(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 17542440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of fixation preference testing in diagnosing amblyopia. Wright KW; Edelman PM; Walonker F; Yiu S Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Apr; 104(4):549-53. PubMed ID: 3954659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of visual acuity. Catford GV; Oliver A Arch Dis Child; 1973 Jan; 48(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 4685594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Teller acuity cards versus clinical judgment in the diagnosis of amblyopia with strabismus. Ellis GS; Hartmann EE; Love A; May JG; Morgan KS Ophthalmology; 1988 Jun; 95(6):788-91. PubMed ID: 3062530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Contemporary methods of studying the sensory apparatus of binocular vision in concomitant strabismus and amblyopia]. Kliuka IV Oftalmol Zh; 1969; 24(6):405-10. PubMed ID: 5396672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A pilot study examining density of suppression measurement in strabismus. Piano M; Newsham D Strabismus; 2015; 23(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25790154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of the Brückner test for strabismus. Miller JM; Hall HL; Greivenkamp JE; Guyton DL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Apr; 36(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 7706038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Method of testing and threshold of depth vision in preschool children with amblyopia and strabismus]. Boichuk IM Oftalmol Zh; 1983; 38(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 6646568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Strabismus, amblyopia, and dyslexia. Gitschlag G; Scott WE Prim Care; 1982 Dec; 9(4):661-77. PubMed ID: 6925845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical stereopsis testing: contour and random dot stereograms. Cooper J J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 368108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]