These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20603206)

  • 21. Vocoder simulations of highly focused cochlear stimulation with limited dynamic range and discriminable steps.
    Stafford RC; Stafford JW; Wells JD; Loizou PC; Keller MD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 24322978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech perception abilities in children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Somers MN
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():174-8. PubMed ID: 2069178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Word recognition by children listening to speech processed into a small number of channels: data from normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants.
    Dorman MF; Loizou PC; Kemp LL; Kirk KI
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 11132785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Listening effort with cochlear implant simulations.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; Baskent D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1075-84. PubMed ID: 23275424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.
    Fitzgerald MB; Sagi E; Morbiwala TA; Tan CT; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 23807089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Elderly listeners with low intelligibility scores under reverberation show degraded subcortical representation of reverberant speech.
    Fujihira H; Shiraishi K; Remijn GB
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 637():102-107. PubMed ID: 27884735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of stimulation rate on modulation detection and speech recognition by cochlear implant users.
    Arora K; Vandali A; Dowell R; Dawson P
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Feb; 50(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21070121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relative importance of temporal envelope information for intelligibility prediction: a study on cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
    Chen F
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 21546304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlations between word intelligibility under reverberation and speech auditory brainstem responses in elderly listeners.
    Fujihira H; Shiraishi K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jan; 126(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 24906808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of envelope-vocoder processing on F0 discrimination and concurrent-vowel identification.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 16230895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.
    Zeng FG; Nie K; Stickney GS; Kong YY; Vongphoe M; Bhargave A; Wei C; Cao K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Feb; 102(7):2293-8. PubMed ID: 15677723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory-evoked potential studies of cortical maturation in normal hearing and implanted children: correlations with changes in structure and speech perception.
    Eggermont JJ; Ponton CW
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 12701751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.
    Hazrati O; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4188-96. PubMed ID: 23742370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.