BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20603408)

  • 21. Myths, facts and scope of spinal cord tolerance dose revision in Intensity modulated SIB treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: A dosimetrical and radiobiological demonstration.
    Patel G; Mandal A; Choudhary S; Mishra R; Shahi U; Mishra H
    Cancer Radiother; 2021 Feb; 25(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 33293203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biological effective dose evaluation in gynaecological brachytherapy: LDR and HDR treatments, dependence on radiobiological parameters, and treatment optimisation.
    Bianchi C; Botta F; Conte L; Vanoli P; Cerizza L
    Radiol Med; 2008 Oct; 113(7):1068-78. PubMed ID: 18618074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The tumor radiobiology of SRS and SBRT: are more than the 5 Rs involved?
    Brown JM; Carlson DJ; Brenner DJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Feb; 88(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 24411596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical implications of incomplete repair parameters for rat spinal cord: the feasibility of large doses per fraction in PDR and HDR brachytherapy.
    Pop LA; Millar WT; Visser AG; van der Kogel AJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Sep; 51(1):215-26. PubMed ID: 11516872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pulsed dose rate and fractionated high dose rate brachytherapy: choice of brachytherapy schedules to replace low dose rate treatments.
    Visser AG; van den Aardweg GJ; Levendag PC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Jan; 34(2):497-505. PubMed ID: 8567354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Synergistic effects of anti-PDL-1 with ablative radiation comparing to other regimens with same biological effect dose based on different immunogenic response.
    Alinezhad M; Bakhshandeh M; Rostami E; Alimohamadi R; Mosaffa N; Jalali SA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231507. PubMed ID: 32287292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A challenge to traditional radiation oncology.
    Fowler JF; Tomé WA; Fenwick JD; Mehta MP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1241-56. PubMed ID: 15519797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Obtaining organ-specific radiobiological parameters from clinical data for radiation therapy planning of head and neck cancers.
    Quashie EE; Li XA; Prior P; Awan M; Schultz C; Tai A
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Dec; 68(24):. PubMed ID: 37903437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules?
    Shibamoto Y; Miyakawa A; Otsuka S; Iwata H
    J Radiat Res; 2016 Aug; 57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i76-i82. PubMed ID: 27006380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in head and neck cancer.
    Zackrisson B; Mercke C; Strander H; Wennerberg J; Cavallin-Ståhl E
    Acta Oncol; 2003; 42(5-6):443-61. PubMed ID: 14596506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Theoretical implications of incorporating relative biological effectiveness into radiobiological equivalence relationships.
    Holloway RP; Dale RG
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 86(1022):20120417. PubMed ID: 23385996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Altered fractionation: limited by mucosal reactions?
    Kaanders JH; van der Kogel AJ; Ang KK
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):247-60. PubMed ID: 10392810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative assessment of radiation dose and fractionation effects on normal tissue by utilizing a novel lung fibrosis index model.
    Zhou C; Jones B; Moustafa M; Schwager C; Bauer J; Yang B; Cao L; Jia M; Mairani A; Chen M; Chen L; Debus J; Abdollahi A
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):172. PubMed ID: 29116014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early mucosal reactions during and after head-and-neck radiotherapy: dependence of treatment tolerance on radiation dose and schedule duration.
    Fenwick JD; Lawrence GP; Malik Z; Nahum AE; Mayles WP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jun; 71(2):625-34. PubMed ID: 18474317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A feasibility study of spatiotemporally integrated radiotherapy using the LQ model.
    Kim M; Phillips MH
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 63(24):245016. PubMed ID: 30523816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-dose-rate brachytherapy may be radiobiologically superior to low-dose rate due to slow repair of late-responding normal tissue cells.
    Orton CG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jan; 49(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 11163513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic optimization of a linear-quadratic model with incomplete repair and volume-dependent sensitivity and repopulation.
    Wein LM; Cohen JE; Wu JT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul; 47(4):1073-83. PubMed ID: 10863081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biological equivalent dose assessment of the consequences of hypofractionated radiotherapy.
    Jones B; Dale RG; Finst P; Khaksar SJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul; 47(5):1379-84. PubMed ID: 10889393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intra-fraction dose delivery timing during stereotactic radiotherapy can influence the radiobiological effect.
    Murphy MJ; Lin PS; Ozhasoglu C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):481-4. PubMed ID: 17388164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A feasibility study: Selection of a personalized radiotherapy fractionation schedule using spatiotemporal optimization.
    Kim M; Stewart RD; Phillips MH
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6671-8. PubMed ID: 26520757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.