156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20603409)
1. Can electronic zoom replace magnification in mammography? A comparative Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Pascoal A; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
Br J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 83(991):569-77. PubMed ID: 20603409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between image quality in electronic zoom and geometric magnification in digital mammography.
Alkhalifah KH; Brindhaban A; Asbeutah AM
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 24(5):681-689. PubMed ID: 27341625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison between electronic zoom and geometric magnification of clusters of microcalcifications on digital mammography].
Moraux-Wallyn M; Chaveron C; Bachelle F; Taieb S; Ceugnart L
J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 91(9 Pt 1):879-83. PubMed ID: 20814375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming].
Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12063732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications.
Tanaka N; Naka K; Fukushima H; Morishita J; Toyofuku F; Ohki M; Higashida Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 21416317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of stereo shift angle, geometric magnification and display zoom on depth measurements in digital stereomammography.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Darner KL; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2725-34. PubMed ID: 12462741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Youk JH; Choi SH; Han M; Oh KK
Eur Radiol; 2009 Feb; 19(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 18677486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Digital magnification mammography in computed radiography. Initial clinical results].
Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Funke M; Wiese M; von Heyden D; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 9411475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital zoom of the full-field digital mammogram versus magnification mammography: a systematic review.
Øynes M; Strøm B; Tveito B; Hafslund B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4223-4233. PubMed ID: 32222798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 18296767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of breast thickness and lesion location on resolution in digital magnification mammography.
Park HS; Oh Y; Kim ST; Kim HJ
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 22726961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems.
Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Whitman GJ; Johnston DA; Yang WT; Selinko V; Arribas E; Dogan B; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):182-94. PubMed ID: 15719969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
