BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20604652)

  • 1. Viewing ultrasound scan images prior to termination of pregnancy: choice for women or conflict for ultrasonographers?
    Graham O; Ankrett S; Killick SR
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 20604652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's perceptions about seeing the ultrasound picture before an abortion.
    Wiebe ER; Adams L
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Apr; 14(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19340704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Ultrasonographic view and women's behaviour before first-trimester induced abortion].
    Vendittelli F; Lachcar P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Nov; 32(11):965-8. PubMed ID: 15567686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's perspectives on ultrasound viewing in the abortion care context.
    Kimport K; Preskill F; Cockrill K; Weitz TA
    Womens Health Issues; 2012; 22(6):e513-7. PubMed ID: 23040800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomised controlled trial of a decision-aid leaflet to facilitate women's choice between pregnancy termination methods.
    Wong SS; Thornton JG; Gbolade B; Bekker HL
    BJOG; 2006 Jun; 113(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 16709212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A qualitative study of women's decision to view or not view an ultrasound image before early medication abortion.
    Cappiello J; Merrell J; Rentschler D
    Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(4):e413-8. PubMed ID: 24981400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's experience of viewing the products of conception after an abortion.
    Wiebe ER; Adams LC
    Contraception; 2009 Dec; 80(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 19913153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Viewing ultrasound images in the abortion clinic: clients' and health care professionals' opinions.
    Simpson JD; Brown A
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Apr; 24(2):130-133. PubMed ID: 30920317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-dimensional vs. two- plus four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancy and the effect on maternal emotional status: a randomized study.
    Rustico MA; Mastromatteo C; Grigio M; Maggioni C; Gregori D; Nicolini U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 15849804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prenatal three-dimensional ultrasound: perception of sonographers, sonologists and undergraduate students.
    Lee S; Pretorius DH; Asfoor S; Hull AD; Newton RP; Hollenbach K; Nelson TR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 17497645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample.
    Georgsson Ohman S; Waldenström U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18543374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's experiences in connection with induced abortion - a feminist perspective.
    Aléx L; Hammarström A
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2004 Jun; 18(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 15147479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy.
    Gudex C; Nielsen BL; Madsen M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16435312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.
    Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request.
    Kingdon C; Neilson J; Singleton V; Gyte G; Hart A; Gabbay M; Lavender T
    BJOG; 2009 Jun; 116(7):886-95. PubMed ID: 19385961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Home self-administration of vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion at 50-63 days compared with gestation of below 50 days.
    Kopp Kallner H; Fiala C; Stephansson O; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    Hum Reprod; 2010 May; 25(5):1153-7. PubMed ID: 20172871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond political claims: women's interest in and emotional response to viewing their ultrasound image in abortion care.
    Kimport K; Weitz TA; Foster DG
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2014 Dec; 46(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 25209369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do women want disclosure of fetal gender during prenatal ultrasound scan?
    Maaji SM; Ekele BA; Bello SO; Morhason-Bello IO
    Ann Afr Med; 2010; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20418643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation.
    Ashok PW; Hamoda H; Flett GM; Kidd A; Fitzmaurice A; Templeton A
    Contraception; 2005 Feb; 71(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 15707565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes about abortion of women who undergo prenatal diagnosis.
    Kolker A; Burke BM; Phillips JU
    Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():49-73. PubMed ID: 12317576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.