25 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20604656)
1. Vulvar biopsy: Punch biopsy or cervical forceps biopsy?
Tuil A; Bergeron C; Lucet JV; Dabi Y; Favier A; Da Maia E; Uzan C; Mergui JL; Canlorbe G
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 52(10):102667. PubMed ID: 37709202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Squamocolumnar junction visibility, age, and implications for cervical cancer screening programs.
Desai KT; Hansen N; Rodriguez AC; Befano B; Egemen D; Gage JC; Wentzensen N; Lopez C; Jeronimo J; de Sanjose S; Schiffman M
Prev Med; 2024 Mar; 180():107881. PubMed ID: 38286273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stick and move: Hemostasis for inpatient punch biopsies.
Abdulhak AH; Nichols CS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Sep; 89(3):e117-e118. PubMed ID: 34098001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?
Denny LA; Soeters R; Dehaeck K; Bloch B
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jul; 102(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 7647056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How can the incidence of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced? An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model.
Howells RE; O'Mahony F; Tucker H; Millinship J; Jones PW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1075-82. PubMed ID: 11002948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study.
Byrom J; Douce G; Jones PW; Tucker H; Millinship J; Dhar K; Redman CW
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(1):253-6. PubMed ID: 16445640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive value of volume of cervical tissue removed during LLETZ on subsequent preterm delivery: a cohort study.
Kitson SJ; Greig E; Michael E; Smith M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():51-5. PubMed ID: 25016553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An audit to establish the proportion of cervical punch biopsies that meet criteria for adequacy.
Heatley MK
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 20604656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Underwood M; Arbyn M; Parry-Smith W; De Bellis-Ayres S; Todd R; Redman CW; Moss EL
BJOG; 2012 Oct; 119(11):1293-301. PubMed ID: 22882742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of cervical premalignant lesions.
Lindeque BG
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):545-61. PubMed ID: 16150393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone biopsy and hysterectomy in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jones HW
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Mar; 9(1):221-36. PubMed ID: 7600728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
