These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20605001)

  • 21. Utilization of computed tomography scanners and the health planning issue: a process data summary.
    Enlow RA; Ehlert K; Glenn W; Hodak J; Rall K; Wilson WJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Apr; 3(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 429632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Technical note: a headholder for computed tomography equipment that does not have a water bath.
    Frederick PR; Russell JG; Battison T
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1977 Jul; 1(3):354-5. PubMed ID: 615214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs.
    Bohrer E; Schäfer S; Mäder U; Noël PB; Krombach GA; Fiebich M
    Z Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 27(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 27720574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A study on optimal scan conditions of Big Bore multi-slice computed tomography based on radiation dose and image noise.
    Lee JS; Ye SJ; Kim EH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):237-40. PubMed ID: 21502298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. AN INVESTIGATION INTO CT RADIATION DOSE VARIATIONS FOR HEAD EXAMINATIONS ON MATCHED EQUIPMENT.
    Zarb F; Foley S; Holm S; Toomey R; Evanoff MG; Rainford L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Dec; 172(4):466-474. PubMed ID: 26822422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dose of CT protocols acquired in clinical routine using a dual-layer detector CT scanner: A preliminary report.
    van Ommen F; de Jong HWAM; Dankbaar JW; Bennink E; Leiner T; Schilham AMR
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 112():65-71. PubMed ID: 30777221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Research methodology for the investigation of rural surgical services.
    Ellehoj E; Tepper J; Barrett B; Iglesias S
    Can J Rural Med; 2006; 11(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 16921665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of dosimetric properties among four commercial multi-detector computed tomography scanners.
    Ohno T; Araki F; Onizuka R; Hatemura M; Shimonobou T; Sakamoto T; Okumura S; Ideguchi D; Honda K; Kawata K
    Phys Med; 2017 Mar; 35():50-58. PubMed ID: 28254400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of radiation doses between newborns and 6-y-old children undergoing head, chest and abdominal CT examinations: a phantom study.
    Sugimoto N; Aoyama T; Koyama S; Yamauchi-Kawaura C; Fujii K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jan; 153(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 22645383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The ideal head CT scanner.
    Neuroradiology; 1978; 16():652-36. PubMed ID: 745779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Size-specific, scanner-independent organ dose estimates in contiguous axial and helical head CT examinations.
    McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon C; Zankl M; Sepahdari AR; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121909. PubMed ID: 25471969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A routine quality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systems.
    Iball GR; Moore AC; Crawford EJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 27455490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the uncertainties in effective dose estimates of adult CT head scans.
    Gregory KJ; Bibbo G; Pattison JE
    Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3501-10. PubMed ID: 18777910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner.
    Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modulation transfer functions of single-slice and dual-slice computed tomography scanners.
    Venema HW
    Med Phys; 1996 Nov; 23(11):1863-4. PubMed ID: 8947898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Mobile CT at neurointensive sections--it is possible].
    Frost M; Stenkær S; Kellenberger S; Ehlers L
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2011 Jan; 173(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 21262173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Continuous Versus Sequential Acquisition Head Computed Tomography: A Phantom and Clinical Image Quality Comparative Study.
    Davis AJ; Ozsvath J; Vega E; Babb JS; Hagiwara M; George A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(6):876-81. PubMed ID: 26359580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Geographic disparities in the utilisation of computed tomography scanning services in southern New Zealand.
    Nixon G; Samaranayaka A; de Graaf B; McKechnie R; Blattner K; Dovey S
    Health Policy; 2014 Nov; 118(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 24973925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neusoft Neuviz 16.
    Health Devices; 2012 Dec; 41(12):392-7. PubMed ID: 23444682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.