These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20605990)
21. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research. Orentlicher D Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The welcome reassessment of research ethics: is "undue inducement" suspect? Brody H Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 16179298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Perception of medical personnel on informed consent for research participation in Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine. Suwanpakdee D; Chamnanvanakij S; Panichkul S J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Nov; 91(11):1754-9. PubMed ID: 19127800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical and research ethics as moral strangers. Kottow MH Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 19479200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. For phase I studies, ethical and practical concerns abound. Travis K J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Sep; 96(18):1354-5. PubMed ID: 15367565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects. Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The sex kitten of bioethics? Research ethics comes of age. Morreim H Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 18947126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Randomized, controlled trials as minimal risk: an ethical analysis. Morris MC; Nelson RM Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):940-4. PubMed ID: 17255879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are we taking without giving in return? The ethics of research-related biopsies and the benefits of clinical trial participation. Helft PR; Daugherty CK J Clin Oncol; 2006 Oct; 24(30):4793-5. PubMed ID: 17050863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The most plausible pro-coercion view: requiring informed agreement while penalizing non-participation in research. Barnhill A J Law Biosci; 2015 Feb; 2(1):118-122. PubMed ID: 27774188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? Festinger DS; Marlowe DB; Croft JR; Dugosh KL; Mastro NK; Lee PA; Dematteo DS; Patapis NS Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Jun; 78(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15893158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Research ethics and revised law regarding the Danish Central Scientific Ethical Committee]. Kamper-Jørgensen F Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2337-40. PubMed ID: 15281571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence. Klitzman R J Med Ethics; 2013 Apr; 39(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 22982492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Informative inducement: study payment as a signal of risk. Cryder CE; John London A; Volpp KG; Loewenstein G Soc Sci Med; 2010 Feb; 70(3):455-464. PubMed ID: 19926187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]