These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20606230)

  • 21. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in college women with a polymerase chain reaction assay.
    Baxter R
    Clin Infect Dis; 2000 Feb; 30(2):406-7. PubMed ID: 10671359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lessons learned from a population-based chlamydia screening pilot.
    Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
    Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):826-30. PubMed ID: 17212860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Screening lab tests of Chlamydia trachomatis. Do they show declining trend of the infections?].
    Ruczkowska J; Choroszy-Król I
    Przegl Epidemiol; 1998; 52(1-2):163-9. PubMed ID: 9738427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Screening for chlamydial infections in women with pelvic inflammatory diseases.
    Chowdhary A; Malhotra VL; Deb M; Rai U
    J Commun Dis; 1998 Sep; 30(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 10093422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Ruitenberg EN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(19):1012. PubMed ID: 10368724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Chlamydia trachomatis infections--a time for action?].
    Mylonas I; Kirschner W; Weissenbacher T; Gingelmaier A; Weissenbacher ER; Friese K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 May; 132(21):1170-6. PubMed ID: 17506013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Association of insurance coverage with chlamydia screening.
    Pourat N; Tao GA; Walsh CM
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Apr; 14(4):197-204. PubMed ID: 18402512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Increase in Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Sweden: time for new strategies.
    Sylvan S; Christenson B
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Jun; 37(3):362-4. PubMed ID: 18058014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice?].
    Halvorsen LE; Skjeldestad FE; Nordbø SA; Løge I
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jun; 112(16):2080-1. PubMed ID: 1523627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new role for Chlamydia trachomatis serology?
    Johnson AM; Horner P
    Sex Transm Infect; 2008 Apr; 84(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 18256104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme.
    Gleave T
    Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chlamydia screening programme, HMP Hydebank Wood Young Offender Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
    Hirst H; Dinsmore WW
    Int J STD AIDS; 2009 May; 20(5):360-1. PubMed ID: 19386977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. To screen or not to screen: prevalence of C. trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic male adolescents attending health maintenance pediatric visits.
    Tebb KP; Shafer MA; Wibbelsman CJ; Pecson S; Tipton AC; Neuhaus JM; Ko TH; Pantell RH
    J Adolesc Health; 2004 Mar; 34(3):166-8. PubMed ID: 14967338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Where do young Irish women want Chlamydia-screening services to be set up? A qualitative study employing Goffman's impression management framework.
    Balfe M; Brugha R; O' Connell E; McGee H; O' Donovan D
    Health Place; 2010 Jan; 16(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 19744875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Genital Chlamydia--can we rely on the figures?].
    Skaare D; Tveten Y; Kristiansen BE
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Dec; 127(24):3232-4. PubMed ID: 18084367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Home sampling versus conventional swab sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in women: a cluster-randomized 1-year follow-up study.
    Ostergaard L; Andersen B; Møller JK; Olesen F
    Clin Infect Dis; 2000 Oct; 31(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 11049776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.
    Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Opportunistic screening for chlamydia.
    Banerjee I
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Jan; 31(1):81; author reply 81. PubMed ID: 15720865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The silent epidemic of Chlamydia: what are we missing here?
    Sanfilippo JS
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 21(5):231-2. PubMed ID: 18794016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Chlamydia trachomatis detection in cervical PreservCyt specimens from an Irish urban female population.
    Keegan H; Ryan F; Malkin A; Griffin M; Lambkin H
    Cytopathology; 2009 Apr; 20(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 18093220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.