319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20606542)
21. Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Latest developments and review of the literature.
Kavallaris A; Zygouris D; Dafopoulos A; Kalogiannidis I; Terzakis E
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 25872326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Urinary tract morbidity after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer.
Novackova M; Pastor Z; Chmel R; Brtnicky T; Chmel R
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 May; 31(5):981-987. PubMed ID: 31444536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predicting factors for resumption of spontaneous voiding following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Nantasupha C; Charoenkwan K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 29(4):e59. PubMed ID: 29770629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and quality of life.
van Gent MD; Romijn LM; van Santen KE; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Maturitas; 2016 Dec; 94():30-38. PubMed ID: 27823742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Laterza RM; Sievert KD; de Ridder D; Vierhout ME; Haab F; Cardozo L; van Kerrebroeck P; Cruz F; Kelleher C; Chapple C; Espuña-Pons M; Koelbl H
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Apr; 34(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 24519734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres.
Yin S; Ma SN; Zhang YQ; Shi TY; Xiang LB; Ren YL; Zang RY
Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):380-386. PubMed ID: 30217291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study.
Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Spagnolo E; Casadio P; Clarizia R; Peiretti M; Bruni F; Peters I; Aletti G
Anticancer Res; 2012 Feb; 32(2):581-8. PubMed ID: 22287748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality of life and sexual, bladder, and intestinal dysfunctions after class III nerve-sparing and class II radical hysterectomies: a questionnaire-based study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Borreani C; Kusamura S; Hanozet F; Brunelli C; Rossi G; Solima E; Fontanelli R; Zanaboni F; Grijuela B; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Jul; 19(5):953-7. PubMed ID: 19574791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Preliminary study of nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Sun L; Wu LY; Zhang WH; Li XG; Song Y; Zhang X
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 31(8):607-11. PubMed ID: 20021949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Urodynamics and Survival Outcomes of Different Methods of Dissecting the Inferior Hypogastric Plexus in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy of Type C: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1560-1568. PubMed ID: 30759291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk factors for persistent low bladder compliance after radical hysterectomy.
Oda Y; Todo Y; Hanley S; Hosaka M; Takeda M; Watari H; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 21330841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study.
Kim HS; Kim TH; Suh DH; Kim SY; Kim MA; Jeong CW; Hong KS; Song YS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):1987-95. PubMed ID: 25465377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Current concepts and practical techniques of nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Kyo S; Kato T; Nakayama K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():80-88. PubMed ID: 27825032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The measurement of vesical detrusor electromyographic activity during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Chen CL; Guo HX; Yu YH; Liu P; Huang JS; Lu L; Guo Y; Liu W; Qi ST; Pan SY; Hou GN
Reprod Sci; 2010 Dec; 17(12):1144-52. PubMed ID: 21098217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sexual function after modified radical hysterectomy (Piver II/Type B) vs. classic radical hysterectomy (Piver III/Type C2) for early stage cervical cancer. A prospective study.
Plotti F; Nelaj E; Sansone M; Antonelli E; Altavilla T; Angioli R; Benedetti Panici P
J Sex Med; 2012 Mar; 9(3):909-17. PubMed ID: 22372655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
van Gent MDJM; Rademaker M; van der Veer JCB; van Poelgeest MIE; Gaarenstroom KN; Putter H; Trimbos JBMZ; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 28704329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
