122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20606816)
1. Value of the swimming position and arm traction in visualizing the cervicothoracic junction over the standard lateral cervical X-ray.
Toksoy A; Bektas F; Eken C; Ceken K; Cete Y
Int J Emerg Med; 2010 Mar; 3(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 20606816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT imaging techniques for describing motions of the cervicothoracic junction and cervical spine during flexion, extension, and cervical traction.
Simon S; Davis M; Odhner D; Udupa J; Winkelstein B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jan; 31(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 16395175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical spine imaging in trauma patients: a simple scheme of rationalising arm traction using zonal divisions of the vertebral bodies.
Ohiorenoya D; Hilton M; Oakland CD; McLauchlan CA; Cobby M; Hughes AO
J Accid Emerg Med; 1996 May; 13(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 8733652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do supine oblique views provide better imaging of the cervicothoracic junction than swimmer's views?
Ireland AJ; Britton I; Forrester AW
J Accid Emerg Med; 1998 May; 15(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 9639174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving Fluoroscopic Visualization for Lower Cervical Medial Branch Blocks with a Modified Swimmer's View: A Technical Report.
Stolzenberg DS; Pheifer R; Armstrong J; Young G; Gehret J; Simon J; Chang-Chien GC
Pain Physician; 2018 May; 21(3):303-308. PubMed ID: 29871375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emergency CT head and neck imaging: effects of swimmer's position on dose and image quality.
Mueck FG; Roesch S; Geyer L; Scherr M; Seidenbusch M; Stahl R; Deak Z; Wirth S
Eur Radiol; 2014 May; 24(5):969-79. PubMed ID: 24531843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Swimmer's view: does it really show what it is supposed to show? A retrospective study.
Rethnam U; Yesupalan RS; Bastawrous SS
BMC Med Imaging; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18197973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analysis of X-rays of cervical imbalances syndrome before and after the treatment of osteopathy and traction intervention in 187 youth cases].
Wang QF; Shi ZT; Huang H; Du CL; Li JH; Chen ZJ; Chen LM; Qi YZ; Ma YF; Yin YS; Jiang AD; Zhang L
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2013 Jan; 26(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 23617136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Improved image quality of the cervical spine neck CT using an arm traction device].
Rosskopf J; Lohrmann N; Beer M; Schmitz BL; Braun M
Orthopade; 2021 Jul; 50(7):578-582. PubMed ID: 33944957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cervical vertebral separation in the supine and seated positions using home traction units.
Fater DC; Kernozek TW
Physiother Theory Pract; 2008; 24(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 19117234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of clinical examination in screening for blunt cervical spine injury.
Gonzalez RP; Fried PO; Bukhalo M; Holevar MR; Falimirski ME
J Am Coll Surg; 1999 Aug; 189(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 10437836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overcoming challenges associated with upright imaging of the cervicothoracic junction: a case report involving a novel repurposing of the O-arm.
Karahalios DG; Mansour NH; Girardot EA; Turner RC
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 23495167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical traction. A comparison of sitting and supine positions.
Deets D; Hands KL; Hopp SS
Phys Ther; 1977 Mar; 57(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 840903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgery in the cervicothoracic junction with an anterior low suprasternal approach alone or combined with manubriotomy and sternotomy: an approach selection method based on the cervicothoracic angle.
Teng H; Hsiang J; Wu C; Wang M; Wei H; Yang X; Xiao J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jun; 10(6):531-42. PubMed ID: 19558285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contralateral oblique view is superior to lateral view for interlaminar cervical and cervicothoracic epidural access.
Gill JS; Aner M; Nagda JV; Keel JC; Simopoulos TT
Pain Med; 2015 Jan; 16(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 25220833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualization of the Cervicothoracic Junction With EOS Imaging Is Superior to Conventional Lateral Cervical Radiographs.
Hirsch BP; Vaynrub M; Siow M; Zou A; Anil U; Montes DV; Protopsaltis TS
Global Spine J; 2021 Jul; 11(6):925-930. PubMed ID: 32677525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical injuries--perils of the swimmer's view: case report.
Davis JW
J Trauma; 1989 Jun; 29(6):891-3. PubMed ID: 2738986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
