245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20607535)
1. FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer: prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficient values of the primary lesion.
Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Kaneko T; Kaneko Y; Takasaki T; Tani A; Ueno M; Koriyama C; Nakajo M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Nov; 37(11):2011-20. PubMed ID: 20607535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging for resected lung cancer: correlation of maximum standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Usuda K; Funasaki A; Sekimura A; Motono N; Matoba M; Doai M; Yamada S; Ueda Y; Uramoto H
Med Oncol; 2018 Apr; 35(5):66. PubMed ID: 29633024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new method for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using sequential (18)F-FDG PET and MRI: correlation with histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Byun BH; Noh WC; Lim I; Lee SS; Cho AR; Park JA; Kim KM; Kim HA; Kim EK; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 27(8):720-8. PubMed ID: 23700260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 18F-FDG uptake by metastatic axillary lymph nodes on pretreatment PET/CT as a prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer.
Song BI; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Chae YS; Lee WK; Ahn BC; Lee J
J Nucl Med; 2012 Sep; 53(9):1337-44. PubMed ID: 22870824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with histopathological prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Ekmekcioglu O; Aliyev A; Yilmaz S; Arslan E; Kaya R; Kocael P; Erkan ME; Halac M; Sonmezoglu K
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Nov; 34(11):1055-67. PubMed ID: 24025919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion-weighted imaging and FDG PET/CT: predicting the prognoses with apparent diffusion coefficient values and maximum standardized uptake values in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Choi BB; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Lee JH; Song BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW
World J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 10():126. PubMed ID: 22741544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of FDG-PET and DWI in breast cancer.
Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Yamano T; Odawara S; Higuchi T; Yamakado K
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 32(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 29134565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated PET/MR mammography for quantitative analysis and correlation to prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kong E; Chun KA; Bae YK; Cho IH
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 26784940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic and prognostic value of pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in breast cancer: comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Baba S; Isoda T; Maruoka Y; Kitamura Y; Sasaki M; Yoshida T; Honda H
J Nucl Med; 2014 May; 55(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 24665089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer.
Koo HR; Park JS; Kang KW; Han W; Park IA; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3314-21. PubMed ID: 25903708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison of prognostic significance between primary tumor standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Tani A; Kamiyama T; Yonekura R; Fukukura Y; Matsuzaki T; Nishimoto K; Nomoto M; Koriyama C
Clin Nucl Med; 2012 May; 37(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 22475897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous whole-body and breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI examinations in patients with breast cancer: a comparison of apparent diffusion coefficients and maximum standardized uptake values.
Sasaki M; Tozaki M; Kubota K; Murakami W; Yotsumoto D; Sagara Y; Ohi Y; Oosako S; Sagara Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):122-133. PubMed ID: 29159779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity predicts invasive components in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yoon HJ; Kim Y; Kim BS
Eur Radiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):3648-58. PubMed ID: 26063655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increased FDG uptake in breast cancer is associated with prognostic factors.
Sanli Y; Kuyumcu S; Ozkan ZG; Işik G; Karanlik H; Guzelbey B; Turkmen C; Ozel S; Yavuz E; Mudun A
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 May; 26(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 22359222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ductal carcinoma in situ and ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: correlation of FDG uptake with histological and biological prognostic factors.
Seo YY; Yoo IR; Park SY; Oh JK; Kim SH; Sohn HS
Breast Cancer; 2017 May; 24(3):353-361. PubMed ID: 27312540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percentage change of primary tumor on 18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor for invasive ductal breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis: Comparison with MRI.
Yoo J; Kim BS; Chung J; Yoon HJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Aug; 96(31):e7657. PubMed ID: 28767583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
