124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20609424)
1. A critique and two corrigenda.
Florence AT
Int J Pharm; 2010 Oct; 398(1-2):246. PubMed ID: 20609424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
Clarke SP
Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the reviewers of animal research.
Rollin BE; Loew FM
Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5548):1831-2. PubMed ID: 11732546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How to critique qualitative research articles.
Forchuk C; Roberts J
Can J Nurs Res; 1993; 25(4):47-55; quiz 56. PubMed ID: 10603806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
Scarfe WC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.
Begley CG; Buchan AM; Dirnagl U
Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):25-7. PubMed ID: 26333454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Let's make peer review scientific.
Rennie D
Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7610):31-3. PubMed ID: 27383970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Homoeopathy research.
Righetti M
Explore (NY); 2006 Jan; 2(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 16781600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review.
Chambers DW
J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(4):2-4. PubMed ID: 11887362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The expanded critique concept for enlarging the reviewer's influence regarding original research articles.
Leever DL
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):389-91; author reply 394-5. PubMed ID: 10515132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers.
Rowan M; Huston P
CMAJ; 1997 Nov; 157(10):1442-6. PubMed ID: 9371080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical appraisal. 8. Appraising qualitative research.
Thompson C
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Nov; 3(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 10827680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
Koop PP
Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of published articles in CAJM.
Nystrom L
Cent Afr J Med; 1998 Oct; 44(10):264-5. PubMed ID: 10101438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
Koop PM
Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary but promising: the value of limited studies.
Keeling RP
J Am Coll Health; 1999 Nov; 48(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 10584443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The qualitative research methodology.
Saddler D
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18300830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Emergence of "pseudoscience".
Healey MA
Can Fam Physician; 1998 Nov; 44():2374-5. PubMed ID: 9839046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Inaccuracies in a published paper--what is the accurate Ilorin experience on angular deformities of the knees in children?
Solagberu BA
West Afr J Med; 2003 Jun; 22(2):187-8; author reply 188-9. PubMed ID: 14529235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
