These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2061055)

  • 1. Prepaid versus traditional Medicaid plans: lack of effect on pregnancy outcomes and prenatal care.
    Carey TS; Weis K; Homer C
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Jun; 26(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 2061055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic testing and return visits for acute problems in prepaid, case-managed Medicaid plans compared with fee-for-service.
    Carey TS; Weis K
    Arch Intern Med; 1990 Nov; 150(11):2369-72. PubMed ID: 2241447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prepaid versus traditional Medicaid plans: effects on preventive health care.
    Carey T; Weis K; Homer C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43(11):1213-20. PubMed ID: 2243257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of capitated and fee-for-service Medicaid reimbursement methods on pregnancy outcomes.
    Oleske DM; Branca ML; Schmidt JB; Ferguson R; Linn ES
    Health Serv Res; 1998 Apr; 33(1):55-73. PubMed ID: 9566177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicaid prenatal care: a comparison of use and outcomes in fee-for-service and managed care.
    Krieger JW; Connell FA; LoGerfo JP
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 1739144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicaid managed care and infant health.
    Levinson A; Ullman F
    J Health Econ; 1998 Jun; 17(3):351-68. PubMed ID: 10180922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The long-term effects of Medicaid managed care on obstetrics care in three California counties.
    Tai-Seale M; LoSasso AT; Freund DA; Gerber SE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Aug; 36(4):751-71. PubMed ID: 11508638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of Medicaid managed care on pregnant women in Ohio: a cohort analysis.
    Howell EM; Dubay L; Kenney G; Sommers AS
    Health Serv Res; 2004 Aug; 39(4 Pt 1):825-46. PubMed ID: 15230930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of mandatory Medicaid managed care in Missouri: impacts for pregnant women.
    Sommers AS; Kenney GM; Dubay L
    Am J Manag Care; 2005 Jul; 11(7):433-42. PubMed ID: 16044980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of drug treatment of childhood persistent asthma in Maryland medicaid recipients in transition from managed fee for service to managed capitation.
    Singhal PK; Zuckerman I; Stuart B; Magder L; Rubin H
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):310-8. PubMed ID: 17506597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A longitudinal evaluation of the effect of Medi-Cal managed care on supplemental security income and aid to families with dependent children enrollees in two California counties.
    Lo Sasso AT; Freund DA
    Med Care; 2000 Sep; 38(9):937-47. PubMed ID: 10982115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prepaid capitation versus fee-for-service reimbursement in a Medicaid population.
    Badgett JT; Rabalais GP
    Am J Manag Care; 1997 Feb; 3(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 10169262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The status of prenatal care among Medicaid Managed Care patients in Connecticut.
    Van Hoof TJ; Casey BA; Tate JP; Linnane JJ; Petrillo MK; Meehan TP
    Eval Health Prof; 2000 Dec; 23(4):409-21. PubMed ID: 11139868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of capitation on health and functional status of the Medicaid elderly. A randomized trial.
    Lurie N; Christianson J; Finch M; Moscovice I
    Ann Intern Med; 1994 Mar; 120(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 8311374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of a mandatory Medicaid case management program on prenatal care and birth outcomes. A retrospective analysis.
    Goldfarb NI; Hillman AL; Eisenberg JM; Kelley MA; Cohen AV; Dellheim M
    Med Care; 1991 Jan; 29(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 1986179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality improvement efforts in prenatal care for Oklahoma Medicaid managed care patients: 1995-1998.
    Millar JS; Winston T; McCauley D; Mitchell L; Hays C
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2002 Jan; 95(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 11799801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do children receiving Supplemental Security Income who are enrolled in Medicaid fare better under a fee-for-service or comprehensive capitation model?
    Mitchell JM; Gaskin DJ
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jul; 114(1):196-204. PubMed ID: 15231928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pediatric outpatient utilization by differing Medicaid payment models in the United States.
    Canares TL; Friedman A; Rodean J; Burns RR; Berkowitz D; Hall M; Alpern E; Montalbano A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jun; 20(1):532. PubMed ID: 32532270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usability of encounter data for Medicaid comprehensive managed care vs traditional Medicaid fee-for-service claims among pregnant women.
    Choi Y; Park H; Hampp C; Brumback B; Meissner HC; Li Y; Roussos-Ross D; Zhu Y; Henriksen C; Winterstein AG
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Jan; 29(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 31737976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of Medicaid managed care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.
    Bindman AB; Chattopadhyay A; Osmond DH; Huen W; Bacchetti P
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15663700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.