176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20613901)
1. Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer.
Kong TW; Lee KM; Cheong JY; Kim WY; Chang SJ; Yoo SC; Yoon JH; Chang KH; Ryu HS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Jun; 21(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 20613901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison Between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in Systematic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Tanaka T; Terai Y; Hayashi S; Aoki D; Miki M; Kobayashi E; Kimura T; Baba T; Matsumura N; Ohmichi M
J Gynecol Surg; 2017 Jun; 33(3):105-110. PubMed ID: 28611530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience.
Shanmugam S; Thanikachalam R; Murugan A
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2020; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 32090010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgical staging for early-stage endometrial cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Nam JH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 24407582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan.
Deura I; Shimada M; Azuma Y; Komatsu H; Nagira K; Sawada M; Harada T
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 30638490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.
Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Pakish J; Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Westin SN; Schmeler KM; Reis RD; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 24361579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: results of a multicenter study.
Holub Z; Jabor A; Bartos P; Eim J; Kliment L
JSLS; 2002; 6(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 12113415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
