These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2061421)
41. Lidocaine versus mepivacaine in sedated pediatric dental patients: randomized, prospective clinical study. Çalış AS; Cagiran E; Efeoglu C; Ak AT; Koca H J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 39(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 25631731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Local anaesthesia--a review of practice. Oliver LP Aust Dent J; 1974 Oct; 19(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 4531889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Spinal procaine is less neurotoxic than mepivacaine, prilocaine and bupivacaine in rats. Takenami T; Yagishita S; Nara Y; Tsai YH; Hiruma H; Kawakami T; Hoka S Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2009; 34(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 19587614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of prilocaine for the reduction of pain associated with transmucosal anesthetic administration. Kramp LF; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP Anesth Prog; 1999; 46(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10853565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Combined perianal-intrarectal (PI) lidocaine-prilocaine (LP) cream and lidocaine-ketorolac gel provide better pain relief than combined PI LP cream and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal prostate biopsy. Cormio L; Pagliarulo V; Lorusso F; Selvaggio O; Perrone A; Sanguedolce F; Bufo P; Carrieri G BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1776-80. PubMed ID: 21999406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study. Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Comparative study of the effects of lidocaine with noradrenaline and prilocaine with felypressin on the cardiovascular system of dogs, according to variations in dosage, time and route of administration]. de Oliveira MA; Tortamano N; Armonia PL; Rocha RG Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1986; 24(2):75-92. PubMed ID: 3507775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Comparative study between 5% prilocaine and 2% mepivacaine by the subarachnoid route in transurethral resections]. Plaja I; Arxer A; Metje M; Santiveri X; Villalonga A; Fernández MA; López MA Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2000 May; 47(5):194-7. PubMed ID: 10902449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Peribulbar anaesthesia: a double-blind comparison of three local anaesthetic solutions. Bedi A; Carabine U Anaesthesia; 1999 Jan; 54(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 10209373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. EMLA cream on the ears--is it effective? A prospective, randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of topical anaesthetic cream in reducing the pain of local anaesthetic infiltration for prominent ear correction. Slator R; Goodacre TE Br J Plast Surg; 1995 Apr; 48(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 7735677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Does the combination of 3% mepivacaine plain plus 2% lidocaine with epinephrine improve anesthesia and reduce the pain of anesthetic injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block? A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Lammers E; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M; Fowler S J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1287-92. PubMed ID: 25146009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Relief of injection pain in adults. EMLA cream for 5 minutes before venepuncture. Nott MR; Peacock JL Anaesthesia; 1990 Sep; 45(9):772-4. PubMed ID: 2240542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pain on injection of prilocaine plain vs. lidocaine with epinephrine. A prospective double-blind study. Wahl MJ; Overton D; Howell J; Siegel E; Schmitt MM; Muldoon M J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Oct; 132(10):1396-401; quiz 1460. PubMed ID: 11680354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Felypressin, but not epinephrine, reduces myocardial oxygen tension after an injection of dental local anesthetic solution at routine doses. Inagawa M; Ichinohe T; Kaneko Y J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1013-7. PubMed ID: 20031290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Noninfiltrative anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective study comparing lidocaine-prilocaine cream and lidocaine-ketorolac gel. Cormio L; Lorusso F; Selvaggio O; Perrone A; Sanguedolce F; Pagliarulo V; Bufo P; Carrieri G Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 21396848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A comparison of the side effects of prilocaine with felypressin and lignocaine with adrenaline in large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix: results of a randomised trial. Howells RE; Tucker H; Millinship J; Shroff JF; Dhar KK; Jones PW; Redman CW BJOG; 2000 Jan; 107(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 10645858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Is prilocaine safe and potent enough for use in the oral surgery of medically compromised patients. Gazal G Saudi Med J; 2019 Jan; 40(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 30617388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Visual pain score during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy using no anaesthesia or three different types of local anaesthetic application. Gurbuz C; Canat L; Bayram G; Gokhan A; Samet G; Caskurlu T Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2010 Sep; 44(4):212-6. PubMed ID: 20377490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A prospective study of pain following loop excision of the transformation zone under local anaesthesia. Hardwick JC; Kennedy JH; Deeny M J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):304-5. PubMed ID: 15203634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]