620 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20614365)
1. Use of a condensation particle counter and an optical particle counter to assess the number concentration of engineered nanoparticles.
Schmoll LH; Peters TM; O'Shaughnessy PT
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Sep; 7(9):535-45. PubMed ID: 20614365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of newly developed portable aerosol sizers used for nanomaterial aerosol measurements.
Yamada M; Takaya M; Ogura I
Ind Health; 2015; 53(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 26320727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization and mapping of very fine particles in an engine machining and assembly facility.
Heitbrink WA; Evans DE; Peters TM; Slavin TJ
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 May; 4(5):341-51. PubMed ID: 17454502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An occupational exposure assessment for engineered nanoparticles used in semiconductor fabrication.
Shepard MN; Brenner S
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):251-65. PubMed ID: 24284882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance Comparison of Field Portable Instruments to the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Using Monodispersed and Polydispersed Sodium Chloride Aerosols.
Vo E; Horvatin M; Zhuang Z
Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Jul; 62(6):711-720. PubMed ID: 29788040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of two portable real-time particle monitors used in nanomaterial workplace exposure evaluations.
Liu Y; Beaucham CC; Pearce TA; Zhuang Z
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105769. PubMed ID: 25148239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations.
Li L; Zuo Z; Japuntich DA; Pui DY
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):581-94. PubMed ID: 22752097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparability of portable nanoparticle exposure monitors.
Asbach C; Kaminski H; von Barany D; Kuhlbusch TA; Monz C; Dziurowitz N; Pelzer J; Vossen K; Berlin K; Dietrich S; Götz U; Kiesling HJ; Schierl R; Dahmann D
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):606-21. PubMed ID: 22752099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies.
Brouwer DH; Gijsbers JH; Lurvink MW
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jul; 48(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 15240340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-certified particulate air-purifying filtering facepiece respirators: evaluation by light scattering photometric and particle number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 22239104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining NSAM and CPC concentrations to determine airborne nanoparticle count median diameter: Application to various laboratory and workplace aerosols.
Bau S; Payet R; Toussaint A; Witschger O; Todea AM; Monz C; Asbach C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Jun; 15(6):492-501. PubMed ID: 29580178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wood dust particle and mass concentrations and filtration efficiency in sanding of wood materials.
Welling I; Lehtimäki M; Rautio S; Lähde T; Enbom S; Hynynen P; Hämeri K
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Feb; 6(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 19065389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing exposure zones by different exposure metrics using statistical parameters: contrast and precision.
Park JY; Ramachandran G; Raynor PC; Eberly LE; Olson G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):799-812. PubMed ID: 20584861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the DiSCmini aerosol monitor to a handheld condensation particle counter and a scanning mobility particle sizer for submicrometer sodium chloride and metal aerosols.
Mills JB; Park JH; Peters TM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(5):250-8. PubMed ID: 23473056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurements of ultrafine particle concentrations and size distribution in an iron foundry.
Cheng YH; Chao YC; Wu CH; Tsai CJ; Uang SN; Shih TS
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Oct; 158(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 18313211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A modified Marple-type cascade impactor for assessing aerosol particle size distributions in workplaces.
Wu YH; Vincent JH
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Oct; 4(10):798-807. PubMed ID: 17763071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Workplace exposure to engineered nanoparticles.
Plitzko S
Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Jul; 21 Suppl 1():25-9. PubMed ID: 19558230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
Thorpe A
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial and temporal variability of incidental nanoparticles in indoor workplaces: impact on the characterization of point source exposures.
Niu J; Rasmussen PE; Magee R; Nilsson G
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Jan; 17(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 25410705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective broadband refractive index retrieval by a white light optical particle counter.
Flores JM; Trainic M; Borrmann S; Rudich Y
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2009 Sep; 11(36):7943-50. PubMed ID: 19727501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
