289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20614412)
1. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial experience of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and ultrasound elastography in predicting breast cancer subtypes and staging.
Wang XL; Tao L; Zhou XL; Wei H; Sun JW
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():130-135. PubMed ID: 27718417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade.
Kim KW; Kuzmiak CM; Kim YJ; Seo JY; Jung HK; Lee MS
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):643-652. PubMed ID: 29339079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning and hand- held ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer: an analysis of 5,566 patient evaluations.
Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Chae EY; Hong MJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(21):9101-5. PubMed ID: 25422185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and specificity of preoperative ultrasonography for diagnosing nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Koehler KE; Ohlinger R
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Aug; 32(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 20938895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical experiences.
Hatzung G; Grunwald S; Zygmunt M; Geaid AA; Behrndt PO; Isermann R; Kohlmann T; Ohlinger R
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 20614414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammotome biopsy under ultrasound control in the diagnostics and treatment of nodular breast lesions - own experience.
Kibil W; Hodorowicz-Zaniewska D; Kulig J
Pol Przegl Chir; 2012 May; 84(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 22763299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas.
Lovrics PJ; Goldsmith CH; Hodgson N; McCready D; Gohla G; Boylan C; Cornacchi S; Reedijk M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3407-14. PubMed ID: 21533657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnostic value of automated breast volume scanner in high-risk and small breast lesions].
Su KL; Xu HB; Zhang ZX; Pan N; He JL; Hu ZJ; Yang OO; Luo H; Yang HF; Liu LL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 35(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 24332060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discordant elastography images of breast lesions: how various factors lead to discordant findings.
Yoon JH; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Choi JS
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun; 34(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 22723039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.
Adamietz BR; Meier-Meitinger M; Fasching P; Beckmann M; Hartmann A; Uder M; Häberle L; Schulz-Wendtland R; Schwab SA
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21165816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?
Roknsharifi S; Fishman MDC; Agarwal MD; Brook A; Kharbanda V; Dialani V
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):923-929. PubMed ID: 30293819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
