312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20614414)
1. Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical experiences.
Hatzung G; Grunwald S; Zygmunt M; Geaid AA; Behrndt PO; Isermann R; Kohlmann T; Ohlinger R
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 20614414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Detection of microcalcifications by high-resolution B-mode sonography in patients with BI-RADS 4a lesions].
Stöblen F; Landt S; Köninger A; Hecktor J; Kimmig R; Kümmel S
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2009; 49(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 20530944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of breast tumors smaller than 2 cm].
Bus'ko EA; Semënov II; Semiglazov VV
Vopr Onkol; 2012; 58(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 22888651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions].
Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Aug; 32(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 20425688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonoelastography in the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Malignant Breast Cancer Compared to Histopathology as a Gold Standard.
Rehman H; Raza S; Aziz S; Ahmad AM; Tahir S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 May; 27(5):267-270. PubMed ID: 28599685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The effectiveness of ultrasound and sonoelastography in the diagnosis of palpable and non-palpable breast lesions].
Bus'ko EA; Mishchenko AV; Semiglazov VV; Tabagua TT
Vopr Onkol; 2013; 59(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 23909041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of real-time strain sonoelastography in BI-RADS 4 and 5 breast masses.
Ozsoy A; Acar D; Barca AN; Aktas H; Araz L; Ozkaraoglu O; Yuksel E
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Sep; 97(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 27211021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.
Adamietz BR; Meier-Meitinger M; Fasching P; Beckmann M; Hartmann A; Uder M; Häberle L; Schulz-Wendtland R; Schwab SA
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21165816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography].
Malich A; Vogel D; Facius M; Marx C; Freesmeyer MG; Sauner D; Hansch A; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12964078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
