These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2061524)

  • 21. [Bad behaviors regarding research and scientific and medical publication].
    Sculier JP
    Rev Med Brux; 2013; 34(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 24505870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions.
    Resnik DB; Neal T; Raymond A; Kissling GE
    Account Res; 2015; 22(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25275621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stemming the tide of disreputable science: implications for nursing.
    Denham SA
    Nurs Forum; 1993; 28(2):11-8. PubMed ID: 8367335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
    Maisonneuve H
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The proper conduct of research.
    Maurer JJ
    Avian Dis; 2007 Mar; 51(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17461259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science.
    Annau Z
    Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity].
    Abad-García MF
    An Pediatr (Engl Ed); 2019 Jan; 90(1):57.e1-57.e8. PubMed ID: 30501937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA.
    Reisig MD; Holtfreter K; Berzofsky ME
    Account Res; 2020 Oct; 27(7):457-475. PubMed ID: 32438829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scientific misconduct: also an issue in nursing science?
    Fierz K; Gennaro S; Dierickx K; Van Achterberg T; Morin KH; De Geest S
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Jul; 46(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 24758524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Data falsification and question on academic integrity.
    Nurunnabi M; Hossain MA
    Account Res; 2019 Feb; 26(2):108-122. PubMed ID: 30595069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scientific integrity in nursing research.
    Morrison RS
    J Neurosurg Nurs; 1993 Oct; 25(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 11654146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
    Cohen P
    New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. From authorship to contributorship. Promoting integrity in research publication.
    White AH; Coudret NA; Goodwin CS
    Nurse Educ; 1998; 23(6):26-32. PubMed ID: 9934109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud.
    Jia H
    Nat Med; 2006 Aug; 12(8):867. PubMed ID: 16892019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chinese decry dishonesty in scientific research.
    Sun M
    Science; 1982 Nov; 218(4575):871. PubMed ID: 11643817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fraud and deceit in published medical research.
    Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):2238-43. PubMed ID: 18041448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.