These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20616137)
1. Evidence for top-down control of eye movements during visual decision making. Glaholt MG; Wu MC; Reingold EM J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):15. PubMed ID: 20616137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities. Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization. Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Motter BC; Simoni DA Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2382-93. PubMed ID: 18722398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sources of top-down control in visual search. Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time. Schreij D; Olivers CN Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons. Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ups and downs (and lefts and rights) of synaesthetic number forms: validation from spatial cueing and SNARC-type tasks. Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Maxwell EC; Nicholls ME; Smilek D Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1190-9. PubMed ID: 19660746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical scanning biases and their possible influence on reading direction: celtic wisdom or folly? Amengual AM; Drago V; Foster PS; Leiguarda RC; Heilman KM J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jan; 14(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18078536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: the elusive homunculus escapes. Yeung N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 20192535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Activity in the visual cortex is modulated by top-down attention locked to reaction time. Moradi F; Hipp C; Koch C J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 17280520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Top-down attention selection is fine grained. Navalpakkam V; Itti L J Vis; 2006 Oct; 6(11):1180-93. PubMed ID: 17209728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search. Schubö A; Müller HJ Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]