214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20616139)
1. Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.
Hoffman DM; Banks MS
J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):13. PubMed ID: 20616139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry.
Hayashi R; Maeda T; Shimojo S; Tachi S
Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2367-80. PubMed ID: 15246753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual integration across natural monocular regions.
Zeiner KM; Spitschan M; Harris JM
J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):5. PubMed ID: 24599943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Focus cues affect perceived depth.
Watt SJ; Akeley K; Ernst MO; Banks MS
J Vis; 2005 Dec; 5(10):834-62. PubMed ID: 16441189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Depth discrimination from occlusions in 3D clutter.
Langer MS; Zheng H; Rezvankhah S
J Vis; 2016 Sep; 16(11):11. PubMed ID: 27618514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
Harris JM; Wilcox LM
Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.
Hillis JM; Watt SJ; Landy MS; Banks MS
J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):967-92. PubMed ID: 15669906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blur and the perception of depth at occlusions.
Zannoli M; Love GD; Narain R; Banks MS
J Vis; 2016; 16(6):17. PubMed ID: 27115522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Binocular rivalry in half-occluded region is weakened by eye movement].
Suzuki M
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Aug; 73(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 12436887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
Makino Y; Yano M
Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.
O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binocular alignment in different depth planes.
Erkelens CJ; Muijs AJ; van Ee R
Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(14):2141-7. PubMed ID: 8776480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Space perception of strabismic observers in the real world environment.
Ooi TL; He ZJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Feb; 56(3):1761-8. PubMed ID: 25698702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants.
van Ee R; van Dam LC; Erkelens CJ
J Vis; 2002; 2(9):597-607. PubMed ID: 12678631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disparity biasing in depth from monocular occlusions.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
Vision Res; 2011 Jul; 51(14):1699-711. PubMed ID: 21651926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Depth-of-Focus Affects 3D Perception in Stereoscopic Displays.
Vienne C; Blondé L; Mamassian P
Perception; 2015; 44(6):613-27. PubMed ID: 26489206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are blur and disparity complementary cues to depth?
Langer MS; Siciliano RA
Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():15-21. PubMed ID: 25482222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Depth of focus and visual recognition of imagery presented on simultaneously viewed displays: implications for head-mounted displays.
Winterbottom MD; Patterson R; Pierce BJ; Covas CM; Winner J
Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):907-19. PubMed ID: 17915606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
