These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20616140)
1. Systematic distortions of perceived planar surface motion in active vision. Fantoni C; Caudek C; Domini F J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):12. PubMed ID: 20616140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: non-retinal information masks retinal information. Ishii M Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1563-8. PubMed ID: 19324065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy. Scarfe P; Hibbard PB Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1599-610. PubMed ID: 16364392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information. Sakai K; Ogiya M; Hirai Y Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2471-80. PubMed ID: 15961137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues. Warren PA; Rushton SK Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1406-19. PubMed ID: 19480063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax. Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apparent position in depth of stationary moving three-dimensional objects. Tsui SY; Khuu SK; Hayes A Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 17069871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new look at binocular stereopsis. Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pushing the limits of transparent-motion detection with binocular disparity. Greenwood JA; Edwards M Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2615-24. PubMed ID: 16530242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flash lag in depth. Harris LR; Duke PA; Kopinska A Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2735-42. PubMed ID: 16469350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-motion perception from expanding and contracting optical flows overlapped with binocular disparity. Ito H; Shibata I Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 15610745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms. Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereo channels with different temporal frequency tunings. Lee S; Shioiri S; Yaguchi H Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17184805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relation between disparity and velocity signals of rigidly moving objects constrains depth order perception. Di Luca M; Domini F; Caudek C Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1335-49. PubMed ID: 17382367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The pursuit theory of motion parallax. Nawrot M; Joyce L Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4709-25. PubMed ID: 17083957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human observers are biased in judging the angular approach of a projectile. Welchman AE; Tuck VL; Harris JM Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):2027-42. PubMed ID: 15149836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dichoptic motion perception limited to depth of fixation? Lages M; Dolia A; Graf EW Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 17112562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]