These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20616145)

  • 1. Assessment of substitution model adequacy using frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Dec; 27(12):2790-803. PubMed ID: 20616145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing adequacy for DNA substitution models.
    Chen W; Kenney T; Bielawski J; Gu H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):349. PubMed ID: 31221105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of criteria for selecting evolutionary models in phylogenetics: a comprehensive study based on simulated datasets.
    Luo A; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Shi W; Ho SY; Xu W; Zhang A; Zhu C
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 10():242. PubMed ID: 20696057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the Adequacy of Molecular Clock Models Using Posterior Predictive Simulations.
    Duchêne DA; Duchêne S; Holmes EC; Ho SY
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Nov; 32(11):2986-95. PubMed ID: 26163668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of proper model assumption in bayesian phylogenetics.
    Lemmon AR; Moriarty EC
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):265-77. PubMed ID: 15205052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics.
    Bollback JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jul; 19(7):1171-80. PubMed ID: 12082136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Substitution Model Adequacy and Assessing the Reliability of Estimates of Virus Evolutionary Rates and Time Scales.
    Duchêne S; Di Giallonardo F; Holmes EC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jan; 33(1):255-67. PubMed ID: 26416981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation.
    Minin V; Abdo Z; Joyce P; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2003 Oct; 52(5):674-83. PubMed ID: 14530134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data-specific substitution models improve protein-based phylogenetics.
    Brazão JM; Foster PG; Cox CJ
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15716. PubMed ID: 37576497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Simon C; Chambers GK
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 12116595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference.
    Lemmon AR; Brown JM; Stanger-Hall K; Lemmon EM
    Syst Biol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):130-45. PubMed ID: 20525573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling compositional heterogeneity.
    Foster PG
    Syst Biol; 2004 Jun; 53(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 15503675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Branch length estimation and divergence dating: estimates of error in Bayesian and maximum likelihood frameworks.
    Schwartz RS; Mueller RL
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Jan; 10():5. PubMed ID: 20064267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution.
    Posada D; Crandall KA
    Syst Biol; 2001 Aug; 50(4):580-601. PubMed ID: 12116655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nucleotide Substitution Model Selection Is Not Necessary for Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny With Well-Behaved Priors.
    Guimarães Fabreti L; Höhna S
    Syst Biol; 2023 Dec; 72(6):1418-1432. PubMed ID: 37455495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.