226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20616237)
1. U.S. science policy. Panel explores what it'll take to keep universities strong.
Mervis J
Science; 2010 Jul; 329(5988):126-7. PubMed ID: 20616237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem cells. HHS inks cell deal; NAS calls for more lines.
Holden C
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1966-7. PubMed ID: 11557847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. science policy. Senate panel backs social sciences at NSF.
Mervis J
Science; 2006 May; 312(5777):1117. PubMed ID: 16728601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. France. Will French science swallow Zerhouni's strong medicine?
Enserink M
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5906):1312. PubMed ID: 19039109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Science policy. Biosummit seeks to draw Obama's attention to the life sciences.
Marshall E
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5908):1623. PubMed ID: 19074321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research.
Majumder MA; Cohen CB
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. science policy. Obama courts a smitten audience at the national academy.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 May; 324(5927):576-7. PubMed ID: 19407168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. science policy. Nobelists go four-on-one with Cheney.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5650):1487. PubMed ID: 14645816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Why French politics and science don't mix.
Nat Mater; 2004 May; 3(5):275. PubMed ID: 15122212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Big bang theory: more reason to scrap Bush's stem cell policy.
Cohen CB
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 19195105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Glocal" science advocacy.
Leshner AI
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):877. PubMed ID: 18276853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientists fight for right to withhold data.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6719):459. PubMed ID: 10028957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science policy. Report faults U.S. strategy for nanotoxicology research.
Service RF
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1779. PubMed ID: 19095914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. science policy. Bush victory leaves scars--and concerns about funding.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5699):1110-3. PubMed ID: 15539568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. research earmarks. Building a scientific legacy on a controversial foundation.
Mervis J
Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5888):480-3. PubMed ID: 18653857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Statement presenting the AFCR's views to the Institute of Medicine Committee on Policies for Allocating Health Sciences Research Funds.
Clin Res; 1989 Apr; 37(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 2702807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Counterterrorism. U.S. science agencies begin to lend a hand.
Malakoff D; Koenig R
Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5543):761-2. PubMed ID: 11679639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research funding. U.S. biodefense boom: eight new study centers.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5639):1450-1. PubMed ID: 12970522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
