88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20616804)
1. Evaluation of the 2009 rehearsal and lessons learned for the 2011 Census.
Townsend N
Popul Trends; 2010; (140):125-52. PubMed ID: 20616804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Key issues in the quality assurance of the One Number Census.
Diamond I; Abbott O; Jackson N
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):11-9. PubMed ID: 14582209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 1991 population estimates for areas smaller than districts.
Simpson S; Cossey R; Diamond I
Popul Trends; 1997; (90):31-9. PubMed ID: 9449158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small area population estimates project: data quality of administrative datasets.
Bates A
Popul Trends; 2004; (116):11-7. PubMed ID: 15272623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The 2011 Census: a proposed design for England and Wales.
Benton P; Massingham R; Brown H; White I
Popul Trends; 2004; (115):16-23. PubMed ID: 15192890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating residents and staff in communal establishments from the 2001 Census.
Bajekal M; Wheller L; Dix D
Health Stat Q; 2006; (31):42-50. PubMed ID: 16972695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 2001 Census output areas: from concept to prototype.
Martin D
Popul Trends; 1998; (94):19-24. PubMed ID: 9885833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rebasing the annual mid-year population estimates for England and Wales.
Duncan C; Chappell R; Smith J; Clark L; Ambrose F
Popul Trends; 2002; (109):9-14. PubMed ID: 12643045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2011 Census Field design: getting the numbers right.
Townsend N
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):19-28. PubMed ID: 21464829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Looking beyond the 2001 Census.
Benton P; White I
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):7-10. PubMed ID: 14582208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications of 2001 Census for local authority district mid-year population estimates.
Smith J; Chappell R; Whitworth A; Duncan C
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):20-31. PubMed ID: 14582210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Population review of 2000: England and Wales.
Ghee C
Popul Trends; 2001; (106):7-14. PubMed ID: 11813357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The 2007 Census Test: evaluation of key objectives.
Compton G
Popul Trends; 2008; (132):26-33. PubMed ID: 18700521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population review of 1999: England and Wales.
Horsfield G
Popul Trends; 2000; (102):5-12. PubMed ID: 11149138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The 2007 Census Test: a major step towards the 2011 Census.
Benton P; McLaren E; Walker S; White I
Popul Trends; 2006; (126):16-28. PubMed ID: 17228616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cohort profile: Children in Need Census (CIN) records of children referred for social care support in England.
Emmott EH; Jay MA; Woodman J
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e023771. PubMed ID: 30798306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inequalities in treated heart disease and mental illness in England and Wales, 1994-1998.
Moser K
Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Jun; 51(467):438-44. PubMed ID: 11407047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infectious diseases in England and Wales: July to September 1999.
Commun Dis Rep CDR Suppl; 2000 Apr; 10 Suppl 1():S1-20. PubMed ID: 10826349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who cares in England and Wales? The Positive Care Law: cross-sectional study.
Shaw M; Dorling D
Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Dec; 54(509):899-903. PubMed ID: 15588533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex ratio patterns in population estimates.
Smallwood S; De Broe S
Popul Trends; 2009; (137):41-50. PubMed ID: 19835114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
