600 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20617218)
1. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.
Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study.
Gotfredsen K; Holm B
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11203620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparison of marginal bone loss around mandibular overdenture-supporting implants with two different attachment types in a loading period of 36 months.
Bilhan H; Mumcu E; Arat S
Gerodontology; 2011 Mar; 28(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 19682097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri-implant tissues of bar-implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 1-year clinical and radiographical study.
Elsyad MA; Shoukouki AH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 20443800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
Walton JN
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of three-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year retrospective study.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Mumcu E
Quintessence Int; 2011 Oct; 42(9):721-8. PubMed ID: 21909496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate loading of two implants supporting a magnet attachment-retained overdenture: one-year clinical study.
Pae A; Kim JW; Kwon KR
Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):428-36. PubMed ID: 20881814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular two-implant telescopic overdentures.
Heckmann SM; Schrott A; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 15355398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading.
Assad AS; Hassan SA; Shawky YM; Badawy MM
Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 17563512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary overdentures supported by four or six implants in the anterior region; 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.
Slot W; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 23320877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures.
Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
