These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
605 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20617218)
21. Long-term clinical and prosthetic outcomes of soft liner and clip attachments for bar/implant overdentures: a randomised controlled clinical trial. ELsyad MA; Shaheen NH; Ashmawy TM J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 44(6):472-480. PubMed ID: 28258636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes. Ma S; Tawse-Smith A; Thomson WM; Payne AG Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 20617220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical outcome of overdenture treatment on two nonsubmerged and nonsplinted Astra Tech Microthread implants. De Bruyn H; Besseler J; Raes F; Vaneker M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 18657151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcome of implant-supported overdenture treatment--a survey of 58 patients. Kuoppala R; Näpänkangas R; Raustia A Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e577-84. PubMed ID: 22616909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Five-year prospective evaluation of mandibular overdentures retained by two microthreaded, TiOblast nonsplinted implants and retentive ball anchors. Cooper LF; Moriarty JD; Guckes AD; Klee LB; Smith RG; Almgren C; Felton DA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):696-704. PubMed ID: 18807567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. van Kampen F; Cune M; van der Bilt A; Bosman F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Dec; 14(6):720-6. PubMed ID: 15015948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Marginal bone loss and prosthetic maintenance of bar-retained implant-supported overdentures: a prospective study. Akca K; Cehreli MC; Uysal S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 20209196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Immediate versus early loading of mini-implants supporting mandibular overdentures: a preliminary 3-year clinical outcome report. Maryod WH; Ali SM; Shawky AF Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 25390870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of resilient liner and clip attachments for bar-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on opposing maxillary ridge. A 5-year randomised clinical trial. Elsyad MA; Ashmawy TM; Faramawy AG J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 41(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 24354686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Aunmeungtong W; Kumchai T; Strietzel FP; Reichart PA; Khongkhunthian P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27804205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A prospective randomized study on the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one or two implants: a 12-month follow-up report. Kronstrom M; Davis B; Loney R; Gerrow J; Hollender L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 20209200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrospective analysis of bar-retained dentures with cantilever extension: marginal bone level changes around dental implants over time. Semper W; Heberer S; Nelson K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 20369100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters. Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one-piece, direct metal laser sintering mini-implants: a short-term prospective clinical study. Mangano FG; Caprioglio A; Levrini L; Farronato D; Zecca PA; Mangano C J Periodontol; 2015 Feb; 86(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 25272979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers. Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]