These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20617326)

  • 21. Strength of different meniscus suturing techniques.
    Aşik M; Sener N; Akpinar S; Durmaz H; Göksan A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1997; 5(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 9228313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meniscal screw fixation provides sufficient stability to prevent tears from gapping.
    Dürselen L; Hebisch A; Wagner D; Claes LE; Bauer G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 17027130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A biomechanical study of four different meniscal repair systems, comparing pull-out strengths and gapping under cyclic loading.
    McDermott ID; Richards SW; Hallam P; Tavares S; Lavelle JR; Amis AA
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2003 Jan; 11(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12548447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A cyclic testing comparison of FasT-Fix and RapidLoc devices in human cadaveric meniscus.
    Nyland J; Chang H; Kocabey Y; Nawab A; Brand J; Caborn DN
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 May; 128(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 18094981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Failure strengths of different meniscal suturing techniques.
    Rimmer MG; Nawana NS; Keene GC; Pearcy MJ
    Arthroscopy; 1995 Apr; 11(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 7794425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study.
    Dervin GF; Downing KJ; Keene GC; McBride DG
    Arthroscopy; 1997 Jun; 13(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 9195024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone plug versus suture fixation of the posterior horn in medial meniscalallograft transplantation: a biomechanical study.
    Hunt S; Kaplan K; Ishak C; Kummer FJ; Meislin R
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 18333824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Meniscal repair using large diameter horizontal sutures increases fixation strength: an in vitro study.
    Kocabey Y; Taşer O; Hapa O; Güçlü A; Bozdag E; Sünbüloglu E; Doral M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011 Feb; 19(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 20602087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical comparison of meniscal repair devices with mattress suture devices in vitro.
    Aros BC; Pedroza A; Vasileff WK; Litsky AS; Flanigan DC
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2010 Nov; 18(11):1594-8. PubMed ID: 20532866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Meniscal root suturing techniques: implications for root fixation.
    Kopf S; Colvin AC; Muriuki M; Zhang X; Harner CD
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21765008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures.
    Boenisch UW; Faber KJ; Ciarelli M; Steadman JR; Arnoczky SP
    Am J Sports Med; 1999; 27(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 10496581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis on biomechanical properties of meniscus repairs: are devices better than sutures?
    M Buckland D; Sadoghi P; Wimmer MD; Vavken P; Pagenstert GI; Valderrabano V; Rosso C
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Jan; 23(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 24841938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Sep; 16(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 10976122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Failure strength of a new meniscus arrow repair technique: biomechanical comparison with horizontal suture.
    Albrecht-Olsen P; Lind T; Kristensen G; Falkenberg B
    Arthroscopy; 1997 Apr; 13(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 9127076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical properties of bioabsorbable meniscal arrows as a function of tear location: an ex vivo experimental study.
    Jani MM; Silva MJ; Gregush RV; Matava MJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(3):666-74. PubMed ID: 15090383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new, all-inside technique for meniscus repair.
    Miura H; Kawamura H; Arima J; Mawatari T; Nagamine R; Urabe K; Iwamoto Y
    Arthroscopy; 1999 May; 15(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 10355724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices.
    Bellemans J; Vandenneucker H; Labey L; Van Audekercke R
    Knee; 2002 Feb; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11830375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A biomechanical analysis of meniscal repair techniques.
    Rankin CC; Lintner DM; Noble PC; Paravic V; Greer E
    Am J Sports Med; 2002; 30(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 12130403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison.
    Rocha de Faria JL; Santos APG; Pavão DM; Radulski M; Leal AC; More ADO; Mozella AP; Guimarães JAM; LaPrade RF; Roesler CRM; Salim R
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2023 Nov; 11(11):23259671231209951. PubMed ID: 38021309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hydrostatic comparison of nonpenetrating titanium clips versus conventional suture for repair of spinal durotomies.
    Faulkner ND; Finn MA; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):E535-9. PubMed ID: 22322376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.